On Jan 6, 2009, at 11:21 , Thomas Roth wrote:> I''ve just upgraded a 1 MDT - 2 OST - 2 Clients - test cluster from
> Lustre version 1.6.5.1 to 1.6.6
> However, I did not follow the manual (
>
http://manual.lustre.org/manual/LustreManual16_HTML/UpgradingLustre.html#50548855_pgfId-1289726)
> :
> I did not use the tunefs.lustre command on MGS/MDT or OSTs.
> My data seem to have survived, the quota had to be switched back on
> with
> lfs quotacheck.
>
> My question: is this treatment with tunefs.lustre ( in particular
> with
> the somewhat scary "writeconf" parameter) actually necessary at
all?
I also did not perform this step. I assumed since the manual at
docs.sun.com wasn''t updated, there were no specific steps required.
http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/get.jsp
links (eventually) to
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-3681
holding
Lustre_1.6_man_v1.14 September 2008
But lustre.org (linked by Thomas) holds the newer Lustre_1.6_man_v1.15
November 2008. However, the example therein is still the previous
one, as it refers to kernel 2.6.18-8.1.14.el5_lustre.1.6.4.2smp, i.e.
lustre 1.6.4.
Hmm - Could *not running* tune2fs have been the cause of my hiccup
with lov_objids that I mentioned last week? As I wrote then, my data
was also still intact (at least it was before I opened write access -
ahem.)
Regards, Michael