We have been using 1.6 Beta6 version for our clients about 2 months but I am curious if there is a newer beta version. I am more concerned about the statahead problem and if it was resolved in any newer versions. TIA
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 11:48 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:> We have been using 1.6 Beta6 version for our clients about 2 months > but I am curious if there is a newer beta version. I am more concerned > about the statahead problem and if it was resolved in any newer > versions.We don''t do public betas -- that is we don''t make available the release-candidate packages that we use in QA. If you want to get code ahead of a full official release, you will need to fetch it from CVS and build binaries yourself. Of course, there is no quality guarantee of any branch or tag from CVS that does not represent an official release. To get our release candidates from CVS, you will be interested in the vX_Y_X_RCn tags, or the b_release_X_Y_Z branches. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080929/655158f6/attachment.bin
On Sep 28, 2008 11:48 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:> We have been using 1.6 Beta6 version for our clients about 2 months > but I am curious if there is a newer beta version. I am more concerned > about the statahead problem and if it was resolved in any newer > versions.The most recent Lustre release is 1.6.5.1. There hasn''t been a "beta" version of Lustre 1.6 in probably 2 years, with a version number something like 1.5.91 or similar - I sure hope you aren''t using that? Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
LOL no. I am using lustre: 1.6.5.52 kernel: patchless build: 1.6.5.52-19691231190000.... I was wondering if there was a newer/more stable beta..thats all On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Andreas Dilger <adilger at sun.com> wrote:> On Sep 28, 2008 11:48 -0400, Mag Gam wrote: >> We have been using 1.6 Beta6 version for our clients about 2 months >> but I am curious if there is a newer beta version. I am more concerned >> about the statahead problem and if it was resolved in any newer >> versions. > > The most recent Lustre release is 1.6.5.1. There hasn''t been a "beta" > version of Lustre 1.6 in probably 2 years, with a version number something > like 1.5.91 or similar - I sure hope you aren''t using that? > > Cheers, Andreas > -- > Andreas Dilger > Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group > Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. > >
Is there a httpd site I can download the Beta CVS version from? It seems my company blocks cvs traffic. On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Mag Gam <magawake at gmail.com> wrote:> LOL no. > > I am using > lustre: 1.6.5.52 > kernel: patchless > build: 1.6.5.52-19691231190000.... > > > I was wondering if there was a newer/more stable beta..thats all > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Andreas Dilger <adilger at sun.com> wrote: >> On Sep 28, 2008 11:48 -0400, Mag Gam wrote: >>> We have been using 1.6 Beta6 version for our clients about 2 months >>> but I am curious if there is a newer beta version. I am more concerned >>> about the statahead problem and if it was resolved in any newer >>> versions. >> >> The most recent Lustre release is 1.6.5.1. There hasn''t been a "beta" >> version of Lustre 1.6 in probably 2 years, with a version number something >> like 1.5.91 or similar - I sure hope you aren''t using that? >> >> Cheers, Andreas >> -- >> Andreas Dilger >> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group >> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. >> >> >
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 22:41 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:> Is there a httpd site I can download the Beta CVS version from?No. We don''t publish beta versions. The only way to get a release ahead of general availability is to check it out from CVS and build it yourself.> It > seems my company blocks cvs traffic.Hrm. That seems pretty draconian. I guess they must have their reasons. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20081003/7c398e4a/attachment.bin