Hi, Would I have any problem running Lustre 1.6.5.1 on Kernel 2.6.5.11 ? Please advise. Thanks in advance. Sovo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080808/0dd6ca5c/attachment.html
Brian J. Murrell
2008-Aug-09 01:50 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Lustre 1.6.5.1 on Kernel 2.6.25.11
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 18:44 -0700, SoVo Le wrote:> Hi, > > Would I have any problem running Lustre 1.6.5.1 on Kernel 2.6.5.11 ? > Please advise.Yes, Lustre does not yet support that kernel. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080808/7a45a511/attachment.bin
On Aug 08, 2008 21:50 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:> On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 18:44 -0700, SoVo Le wrote: > > Would I have any problem running Lustre 1.6.5.1 on Kernel 2.6.5.11 ? > > Please advise. > > Yes, Lustre does not yet support that kernel.Well, Lustre supports 2.6.5 SLES9 kernels, though they are heavily patched... Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
Brian J. Murrell
2008-Aug-19 15:08 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Lustre 1.6.5.1 on Kernel 2.6.25.11
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 00:22 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:> On Aug 08, 2008 21:50 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 18:44 -0700, SoVo Le wrote: > > > Would I have any problem running Lustre 1.6.5.1 on Kernel 2.6.5.11 ? > > > Please advise. > > > > Yes, Lustre does not yet support that kernel. > > Well, Lustre supports 2.6.5 SLES9 kernels, though they are heavily > patched...Andreas. I think the "2.6.5.11" above, in the message body is a typo. The Subject says "2.6.25.11". SoVo, there is a bug in our tracking system tracking newer kernel (i.e. post 2.6.22) development but I don''t recall it off-hand. It should be quite easy to search for though. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080819/4b500a9f/attachment.bin
Sébastien Buisson
2008-Sep-01 15:28 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Lustre 1.6.5.1 on Kernel 2.6.25.11
SoVo, if you meant 2.6.25, here is the corresponding bugzilla: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15976 Cheers, Sebastien. Brian J. Murrell wrote:> On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 00:22 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: >> On Aug 08, 2008 21:50 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: >>> On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 18:44 -0700, SoVo Le wrote: >>>> Would I have any problem running Lustre 1.6.5.1 on Kernel 2.6.5.11 ? >>>> Please advise. >>> Yes, Lustre does not yet support that kernel. >> Well, Lustre supports 2.6.5 SLES9 kernels, though they are heavily >> patched... > > Andreas. I think the "2.6.5.11" above, in the message body is a typo. > The Subject says "2.6.25.11". > > SoVo, there is a bug in our tracking system tracking newer kernel (i.e. > post 2.6.22) development but I don''t recall it off-hand. It should be > quite easy to search for though. > > b. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss