Lustre discuss - Aug 2008 - Mailing List is very slow?

Is it me, or the Lustre Discuss mailing list very slow to post
messages? It takes me over 2-3 days to get a message approved and then
be posted in the archives?

Any ideas how I can speed this up?

TIA

On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 00:03 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
> Is it me, or the Lustre Discuss mailing list very slow to post
> messages? It takes me over 2-3 days to get a message approved and then
> be posted in the archives?
This particular message sent by you was received by google Sat, 02 Aug
2008 21:03:46 -0700 (PDT): 

Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so1874215rvb.14     for
        <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:03:46
-0700 (PDT)

It was then received by lists.lustre.org at Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:03:49
-0700 (PDT):

Received: by lists.lustre.org (Postfix, from userid 60001)      id 2AB284E6253;
        Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:03:49 -0700 (PDT)

It was then received (for delivery to me) by Sun at Sun, 03 Aug 2008
04:09:31 +0000 (Z)

Received: from lists.lustre.org ([70.42.188.14] [70.42.188.14]) by
        relay22i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-21010455; Sun, 03 Aug 2008
04:09:31
        +0000 (Z)

(which is 21:09:31 PDT).

and many hops later, landed in my mailbox at Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:09:44
-0700 (PDT):

Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.34.119]) by
        sfbay5-mail1.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04
        (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id
        <0K50007IWBK8D510 at sfbay5-mail1.sfbay.sun.com>; Sat, 02 Aug 2008
21:09:44
        -0700 (PDT)

So assuming clocks are in sync, 2 seconds short of 6 minutes.  Not too
bad.

b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080803/8cf97895/attachment.bin

LMAO. Thanks Brian :-)

I guess I am a little too demanding in this timeless world. My
apologies. But how long does it take to get updated on the list
archives?



On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Brian J. Murrell <Brian.Murrell at
sun.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 00:03 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
>> Is it me, or the Lustre Discuss mailing list very slow to post
>> messages? It takes me over 2-3 days to get a message approved and then
>> be posted in the archives?
>
> This particular message sent by you was received by google Sat, 02 Aug
> 2008 21:03:46 -0700 (PDT):
>
> Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so1874215rvb.14     for
>        <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>; Sat, 02 Aug 2008
21:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
>
> It was then received by lists.lustre.org at Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:03:49
> -0700 (PDT):
>
> Received: by lists.lustre.org (Postfix, from userid 60001)      id
2AB284E6253;
>        Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
>
> It was then received (for delivery to me) by Sun at Sun, 03 Aug 2008
> 04:09:31 +0000 (Z)
>
> Received: from lists.lustre.org ([70.42.188.14] [70.42.188.14]) by
>        relay22i.sun.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-21010455; Sun, 03 Aug 2008
04:09:31
>        +0000 (Z)
>
> (which is 21:09:31 PDT).
>
> and many hops later, landed in my mailbox at Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:09:44
> -0700 (PDT):
>
> Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.34.119]) by
>        sfbay5-mail1.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server
6.2-8.04
>        (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id
>        <0K50007IWBK8D510 at sfbay5-mail1.sfbay.sun.com>; Sat, 02 Aug
2008 21:09:44
>        -0700 (PDT)
>
> So assuming clocks are in sync, 2 seconds short of 6 minutes.  Not too
> bad.
>
> b.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>