murray smigel
2008-Aug-01 20:09 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Are there plans (schedules) for support of linux-2.6.26?
I am currently on 2.6.18 and would like to go to a kernel with the more modern schedular. Thanks, murray smigel
Mag Gam
2008-Aug-02 02:23 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Are there plans (schedules) for support of linux-2.6.26?
This is a good question. I too am curious. Also, will lustre OST/OSS ever be a module versus compiling into the kernel? On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:09 PM, murray smigel <murray at tradeworx.com> wrote:> I am currently on 2.6.18 and would like to go to a kernel with the more > modern > schedular. > > Thanks, > murray smigel > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
Sébastien Buisson
2008-Aug-04 07:14 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Are there plans (schedules) for support of linux-2.6.26?
Hello, We recently opened a bugzilla for that particular purpose: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15976 Originally it was labelled for 2.6.24/2.6.25 kernels, but 2.6.26 should also be of interest :) Do not hesitate to comment in this bug to show your interest! Cheers, Sebastien. murray smigel a ?crit :> I am currently on 2.6.18 and would like to go to a kernel with the more > modern > schedular. > > Thanks, > murray smigel > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > >
Mag Gam
2008-Aug-04 11:21 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Are there plans (schedules) for support of linux-2.6.26?
Looks like Bugzilla is down. Thanks for the update. On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:14 AM, S?bastien Buisson <sebastien.buisson at bull.net> wrote:> Hello, > > We recently opened a bugzilla for that particular purpose: > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15976 > > Originally it was labelled for 2.6.24/2.6.25 kernels, but 2.6.26 should > also be of interest :) > > Do not hesitate to comment in this bug to show your interest! > > Cheers, > Sebastien. > > > murray smigel a ?crit : >> I am currently on 2.6.18 and would like to go to a kernel with the more >> modern >> schedular. >> >> Thanks, >> murray smigel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
Brian J. Murrell
2008-Aug-06 14:05 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Are there plans (schedules) for support of linux-2.6.26?
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 07:21 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:> Looks like Bugzilla is down.I''ve been using it here for the last few hours and it''s been fine. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080806/eea93ed1/attachment.bin