On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 12:57 -0400, Brock Palen wrote:> On the download site, I am trying to figure out which rpm i need to
> download that would match the ''kernel-devel'' equivilent
for lustre.
>
> I have a need to build the sun multipath driver against that kernel
> for our new MDS''s machines, but it is not very obvious if I need:
>
> lustre-source-1.6.5.1-2.6.9_67.0.7.EL_lustre.1.6.5.1smp.x86_64.rpm
No. This is the lustre source tree.
> Or:
>
> kernel-lustre-source-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL_lustre.1.6.5.1.x86_64.rpm
Yes, this is what you want.
> Is there a reason why there is not just a normal:
> kernel-lustre-smp-devel
>
> Just like RedHat/SLES provides?
Because we don''t use the RHEL kernel build process. We have our own
kernel .spec. That could change in the future though. See bug 16312.
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080725/4cef1f15/attachment.bin