I am using the 2.6.22.19 series kernel and I noticed a problem compiling ldiskfs. I had to manually compile the ldiskfs module and after it was compiled and I try to load the module, I keep getting, ldiskfs: Unkown symbol d_move_locked ldiskfs: Unkown symbol d_rehash_cond ldiskfs: Unkown symbol d_move_locked ldiskfs: Unkown symbol d_rehash_cond I was running compile like this. ./configure --with-linux=/usr/src/linux-2.6.22.19 --enable-ldiskfs Has anyone gotten lustre to compile with 2.6.22.19 versus 2.6.22.0? I suspect this could be a problem. Or am i missing something else? TIA
On Thursday 24 July 2008 04:28:13 Mag Gam wrote:> I am using the 2.6.22.19 series kernel and I noticed a problem > compiling ldiskfs. I had to manually compile the ldiskfs module and > after it was compiled and I try to load the module, I keep getting, > > ldiskfs: Unkown symbol d_move_locked > ldiskfs: Unkown symbol d_rehash_cond > ldiskfs: Unkown symbol d_move_locked > ldiskfs: Unkown symbol d_rehash_condYour kernel is not patched. Patchless only works for lustre-clients, but not for lustre-server.> > I was running compile like this. > ./configure --with-linux=/usr/src/linux-2.6.22.19 --enable-ldiskfs > > > Has anyone gotten lustre to compile with 2.6.22.19 versus 2.6.22.0? IYes, works fine here with patched kernel. Cheers, Bernd -- Bernd Schubert Q-Leap Networks GmbH
Berd: Thanks for the response! I needed some reassurance :-) Are you patching by using quilt? or manually doing a patch -p1 on all the 2.6.22 series patches? Also, once you patch using quilt how can you verify if the patching was successful? Do you know if a more recent kernel is supported, such as 2.6.25 or 2.6.26? I have tried patching that but no luck. TIA On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Bernd Schubert <bs at q-leap.de> wrote:> On Thursday 24 July 2008 04:28:13 Mag Gam wrote: >> I am using the 2.6.22.19 series kernel and I noticed a problem >> compiling ldiskfs. I had to manually compile the ldiskfs module and >> after it was compiled and I try to load the module, I keep getting, >> >> ldiskfs: Unkown symbol d_move_locked >> ldiskfs: Unkown symbol d_rehash_cond >> ldiskfs: Unkown symbol d_move_locked >> ldiskfs: Unkown symbol d_rehash_cond > > Your kernel is not patched. Patchless only works for lustre-clients, but not > for lustre-server. > >> >> I was running compile like this. >> ./configure --with-linux=/usr/src/linux-2.6.22.19 --enable-ldiskfs >> >> >> Has anyone gotten lustre to compile with 2.6.22.19 versus 2.6.22.0? I > > Yes, works fine here with patched kernel. > > > Cheers, > Bernd > > > -- > Bernd Schubert > Q-Leap Networks GmbH >
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 22:28 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:> I am using the 2.6.22.19 series kernel and I noticed a problem > compiling ldiskfs.Is there any reason in particular that you need 2.6.22.19 on a Lustre server? It really is a lot easier to install the pre-packaged RPMs that we provide. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080724/3db67918/attachment-0001.bin
Yes. I would like to have GFS and it supporting modules. On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Brian J. Murrell <Brian.Murrell at sun.com> wrote:> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 22:28 -0400, Mag Gam wrote: >> I am using the 2.6.22.19 series kernel and I noticed a problem >> compiling ldiskfs. > > Is there any reason in particular that you need 2.6.22.19 on a Lustre > server? It really is a lot easier to install the pre-packaged RPMs that > we provide. > > b. > > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > >
Also, it would be nice to have this kernel version http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0314.html#Red%20Hat%20Enterprise%20Linux%20(v.%205%20server) Also, see http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2635 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431092 There is a nasty buy in RHEL 5.1 for NFS server/clients. I would like to have lustre with that kernel if possible. TIA On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Mag Gam <magawake at gmail.com> wrote:> Yes. I would like to have GFS and it supporting modules. > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Brian J. Murrell > <Brian.Murrell at sun.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 22:28 -0400, Mag Gam wrote: >>> I am using the 2.6.22.19 series kernel and I noticed a problem >>> compiling ldiskfs. >> >> Is there any reason in particular that you need 2.6.22.19 on a Lustre >> server? It really is a lot easier to install the pre-packaged RPMs that >> we provide. >> >> b. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> >> >
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 07:25 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:> Also, it would be nice to have this kernel version > > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0314.html#Red%20Hat%20Enterprise%20Linux%20(v.%205%20server)That kernel has been superseded by http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0519.html The lustre/ChangeLog file on b1_6 currently says: tbd Sun Microsystems, Inc. * version 1.6.6 * Support for kernels: ... 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 (RHEL 5), b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080725/4e4d1548/attachment.bin
I don''t have CVS access from my firewalled network. Do you have a website I can download the b6 from? I would really like to try this kernel. Its important. TIA On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Brian J. Murrell <Brian.Murrell at sun.com> wrote:> On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 07:25 -0400, Mag Gam wrote: >> Also, it would be nice to have this kernel version >> >> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0314.html#Red%20Hat%20Enterprise%20Linux%20(v.%205%20server) > > That kernel has been superseded by > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0519.html > > The lustre/ChangeLog file on b1_6 currently says: > > tbd Sun Microsystems, Inc. > * version 1.6.6 > * Support for kernels: > ... > 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 (RHEL 5), > > b. > > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > >
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 20:23 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:> I don''t have CVS access from my firewalled network. > > Do you have a website I can download the b6 from?We don''t. Development releases are only available from CVS. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080728/1cde0a17/attachment.bin