Is there any word on when the IB packages might be making it up to the download site for 1.6.5? As had been previously noted, they were missing when the rest of 1.6.5 was pushed. Thanks, --Joe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080616/a6f1e8b7/attachment.html
On Monday 16 June 2008 04:35:41 am Greenseid, Joseph M. wrote:> Is there any word on when the IB packages might be making it up to > the download site for 1.6.5? As had been previously noted, they were > missing when the rest of 1.6.5 was pushed.I''d like to support this request, since this is part of the 1.6.5 Changelog: """ Severity: enhancement Bugzilla: 15316 Description: build kernel-ib packages for OFED 1.3 in our release cycle """ Also, the download site lists lustre-client and lustre-client-modules RPMs for RHEL5 and SLES10, but not for RHEL4 nor SLES9. Is that by design, or are they missing too? Thanks, -- Kilian
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 16:14 -0700, Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:> On Monday 16 June 2008 04:35:41 am Greenseid, Joseph M. wrote: > > Is there any word on when the IB packages might be making it up to > > the download site for 1.6.5? As had been previously noted, they were > > missing when the rest of 1.6.5 was pushed. > > I''d like to support this request, since this is part of the 1.6.5 > Changelog: > """ > Severity: enhancement > Bugzilla: 15316 > Description: build kernel-ib packages for OFED 1.3 in our release cycle > """1.6.5.1 is in QA right now to solve this issue as well as include a few other minor bugfixes.> Also, the download site lists lustre-client and lustre-client-modules > RPMs for RHEL5 and SLES10, but not for RHEL4 nor SLES9. Is that by > design, or are they missing too?Yes, by design. lustre-client[-modules] is the patchless client which only works reliably on more recent kernels (I think our cuttoff is around 2.6.15 or 2.6.16 or so), so we don''t produce it for SLES9 and RHEL4, which are quite vintage kernels these days. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080620/83b5c028/attachment.bin
> 1.6.5.1 is in QA right now to solve this issue as well as include a few > other minor bugfixes.Excellent! This is a mutually beneficial change that will help make lustre reliably infiniband compatible. I know a lot of people are looking forward to it. -jeff> > b. > > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > >-- Jeff Blasius / jeff.blasius at yale.edu Phone: (203)432-9940 51 Prospect Rm. 011 High Performance Computing (HPC) UNIX Systems Administrator, Linux Systems Design & Support (LSDS) Yale University Information Technology Services (ITS)