Hey has anyone got Lustre running on RHEL4 U5 linux-2.6.9-49.EL? We munged our patches from U4 and posted them here: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11823 but we''ve still got problems - the acceptance-small.sh test fails when copying /etc into lustre and comparing checksums after unmount/remount. All the files seem to be zero length after the remount. Just wondering if anyone else had it working yet - didn''t want to reinvent the wheel. Jim
Nathaniel Rutman
2007-Mar-30 09:59 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] lustre on RHEL4 U5 linux-2.6.9-49.EL
Which version of Lustre? Jim Garlick wrote:> Hey has anyone got Lustre running on RHEL4 U5 linux-2.6.9-49.EL? > We munged our patches from U4 and posted them here: > > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11823 > > but we''ve still got problems - the acceptance-small.sh test fails > when copying /etc into lustre and comparing checksums after > unmount/remount. All the files seem to be zero length after the > remount. > > Just wondering if anyone else had it working yet - didn''t want to > reinvent the wheel. > > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com > https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
Our patched 1.4.8 which we currently run in production on U3 (not U4 - I misspoke). To put a finer point on the problem description: llmount.sh cp /etc/passwd /mnt/lustre diff /etc/passwd /mnt/lustre/passwd # looks good llmountcleanup.sh llrmount.sh ls -l /mnt/lustre/passwd # zero length When I mount the ost image with -o loop I can see the file contents. I''m picking apart the mds image now to try to figure what''s gone wrong. Jim On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Nathaniel Rutman wrote:> Which version of Lustre? > > Jim Garlick wrote: >> Hey has anyone got Lustre running on RHEL4 U5 linux-2.6.9-49.EL? >> We munged our patches from U4 and posted them here: >> >> https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11823 >> >> but we''ve still got problems - the acceptance-small.sh test fails >> when copying /etc into lustre and comparing checksums after >> unmount/remount. All the files seem to be zero length after the >> remount. >> >> Just wondering if anyone else had it working yet - didn''t want to >> reinvent the wheel. >> >> Jim >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com >> https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> >
Brian Behlendorf
2007-Apr-02 13:43 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] lustre on RHEL4 U5 linux-2.6.9-49.EL
I''ve updated the RHEL4 U5 patch set in the bug to address the two major issues we observed. Both of which would have effected 1.6 based releases as much as the 1.4.8 released. Issues fixed: vfs_intent-2.6-rhel4.patch: RHEL4-U5 introduced upstream vfs_{l,f,}stat64 calls which did not tie in to the previous intent hooks. Added a common vfs_getattr64_it() call to be used in these cases. vfs_nointent-2.6-rhel4.patch: Resolves inconsistent i_alloc_sem handling in vfs_nointent-2.6-rhel4.patch which was introduced by RHEL linux-2.6.9-fs-lustre-support.patch. Thanks, Brian> Our patched 1.4.8 which we currently run in production on U3 > (not U4 - I misspoke). > > To put a finer point on the problem description: > > llmount.sh > cp /etc/passwd /mnt/lustre > diff /etc/passwd /mnt/lustre/passwd # looks good > llmountcleanup.sh > llrmount.sh > ls -l /mnt/lustre/passwd # zero length > > When I mount the ost image with -o loop I can see the file contents. > I''m picking apart the mds image now to try to figure what''s gone wrong. > > Jim > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Nathaniel Rutman wrote: > > Which version of Lustre? > > > > Jim Garlick wrote: > >> Hey has anyone got Lustre running on RHEL4 U5 linux-2.6.9-49.EL? > >> We munged our patches from U4 and posted them here: > >> > >> https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11823 > >> > >> but we''ve still got problems - the acceptance-small.sh test fails > >> when copying /etc into lustre and comparing checksums after > >> unmount/remount. All the files seem to be zero length after the > >> remount. > >> > >> Just wondering if anyone else had it working yet - didn''t want to > >> reinvent the wheel. > >> > >> Jim > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Lustre-discuss mailing list > >> Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com > >> https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com > https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss