Lustre discuss - May 2006 - Re: Data redundancy ?

--=-PWW3GhREvbd5z0jOxdyP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

What were your issues? I''m using it with drbd it''s not
perfect, but it
works.

A Qua, 2004-04-21 =C3=A0s 19:18, Benny Millares
escreveu:
> I tried setting it up and I failed. I also tried using NBD but failed as
well. If anyone is able to successfully configure lustre with either of these
product where the OST''s use a network block device in a raid1
configuration please post it in this group.
--=20
						Jo=C3=A3o Miguel Neves



--=-PWW3GhREvbd5z0jOxdyP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem
	assinada digitalmente

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAhva+GFkMfesLN9wRAqXnAJ44Uq5lBH0g0+vz5QRUsODr0mPtpgCfU7Lf
B6TUH7143/KZfIV36cUsXU4=f013
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-PWW3GhREvbd5z0jOxdyP--

I tried setting it up and I failed. I also tried using NBD but failed as well.
If anyone is able to successfully configure lustre with either of these product
where the OST''s use a network block device in a raid1 configuration
please post it in this group.

Another failed project was getting lustre to work with a mosix cluster. Again
any info in this regard would be greatly appreciated.

Benny

=20
-----Original Message-----
From: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com
[mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] On Behalf Of Jo=E3o Miguel
Neves
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 4:30 AM
To: Phil Schwan
Cc: Bernard Dugas; lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Re: Data redundancy ?

A Qua, 2004-04-21 =E0s 05:23, Phil Schwan escreveu:
> On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 17:52, Bernard Dugas wrote:
> > Does Lustre manage a data redundancy insuring data conservation even
in=20
> > the case of a disk crash, ie OST crash in Lustre ? ie something like 
> > raid1 or RAID5...
>=20
> Lustre stores its data on any block device, so you can run software or
> hardware RAID1 or RAID5 underneath Lustre, to protect against individual
> drive failures.
>=20
One other alternative is drbd (http://www.drbd.org). But setting it up
with lustre has some interesting issues.

--=20
						Jo=E3o Miguel Neves