Dan Bassett
2010-Jul-06 19:05 UTC
[Lustre-devel] e2fsprogs-1.41.10.sun2-0redhat provides issues
I have e2fsprogs-1.41.10.sun2-0redhat from the lustre downloads page installed as part of my lustre 1.8.3 installation and it''s causing some weird dependency issues on my OSS''s. When I attempt to upgrade or install new packages on the system I get errors like: krb5-libs-1.6.1-36.el5_5.4.i386 from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libcom_err.so.2 is needed by package krb5-libs-1.6.1-36.el5_5.4.i386 (updates) libcom_err.so.2 is provided as part of the lustre patched e2fsprogs package, whereas it is usually part of e2fsprogs-libs if you get it directly from redhat. The issue seems to be in how the provides are defined for the package: [root at oss0 ~]# rpm -q --provides e2fsprogs e2fsprogs-libs = 1.41.10.sun2 ldiskfsprogs libblkid.so.1()(64bit) libcom_err.so.2()(64bit) libe2p.so.2()(64bit) libext2fs.so.2()(64bit) libss.so.2()(64bit) libuuid.so.1()(64bit) e2fsprogs = 1.41.10.sun2-0redhat And on a CentOS 5 machine that doesn''t have lustre installed: [root at node2 ~]# rpm -q --provides e2fsprogs-libs libblkid.so.1()(64bit) libcom_err.so.2()(64bit) libe2p.so.2()(64bit) libext2fs.so.2()(64bit) libss.so.2()(64bit) libuuid.so.1()(64bit) e2fsprogs-libs = 1.39-23.el5 libblkid.so.1 libcom_err.so.2 libe2p.so.2 libext2fs.so.2 libss.so.2 libuuid.so.1 e2fsprogs-libs = 1.39-23.el5 More to the point: [root at oss0 ~]# rpm -q --whatprovides libcom_err.so.2 no package provides libcom_err.so.2 [root at oss0 ~]# rpm -q --whatprovides "libcom_err.so.2()(64bit)" e2fsprogs-1.41.10.sun2-0redhat The library is installed, however my guess is that due to the extra "()(64bit)" in the provides, rpm refuses to recognize it. Is this something that can be fixed in the e2fsprogs package? Thanks! Dan
Brian J. Murrell
2010-Jul-07 14:23 UTC
[Lustre-devel] e2fsprogs-1.41.10.sun2-0redhat provides issues
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 14:05 -0500, Dan Bassett wrote:> I have e2fsprogs-1.41.10.sun2-0redhat from the lustre downloads page > installed as part of my lustre 1.8.3 installation and it''s causing some > weird dependency issues on my OSS''s. When I attempt to upgrade or > install new packages on the system I get errors like:This is something that most likely warrants a bug being filed in our bugzilla. Cheers, b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel/attachments/20100707/05a0dffd/attachment.bin