Hi, In trying (just to see what happens) to build against patchless 2.6.23, I see that the file_operations structure no longer has the sendfile field. Has anyone in the development team thought of a way around this? Thanks, Ron
Alex Lyashkov
2008-Feb-08 17:54 UTC
[Lustre-devel] 2.6.23 kernel struct file_operations sendfile
Hi Ron, look into bugzilla bug 14250. This bug include patch for buuld patchless client against vanila 2.4.23/24.24 kernels. On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 07:21 -0800, Ron wrote:> Hi, > In trying (just to see what happens) to build against patchless > 2.6.23, I see that the > file_operations structure no longer has the sendfile field. Has > anyone in the development > team thought of a way around this? > Thanks, > Ron > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-devel mailing list > Lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
Hi Alex, great!, Thanks. I''m having trouble finding a version of the source that the patch will apply cleaning to. I''ve tried releases 1.6.0.1, 1.6.3, 1.6.4.1, 1.6.4.2 and then, from cvs, a checkout of a few days ago. Could you please, perhaps give me a cvs tag that I can use? or some other way to get a source tree (to apply the patch to) and then build against patchless 2.6.23.12? Thanks.
Alex Lyashkov
2008-Feb-09 05:14 UTC
[Lustre-devel] 2.6.23 kernel struct file_operations sendfile
Hi Ron, Patch created against sources from cvs - branch b1_6 date 20080116. Patch tested for first with 2.6.23.8 and later with 2.6.24-rc8. if you found any problems with this patch, please submit info into bugzilla. I''m will be fix in next patch version. On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 11:03 -0800, Ron wrote:> Hi Alex, > great!, Thanks. > I''m having trouble finding a version of the source that the patch will > apply cleaning to. > I''ve tried releases 1.6.0.1, 1.6.3, 1.6.4.1, 1.6.4.2 and then, from > cvs, a checkout of a few days ago. > Could you please, perhaps give me a cvs tag that I can use? or some > other way to get a source tree (to apply the patch to) and then build > against patchless 2.6.23.12? > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-devel mailing list > Lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel