scjody@clusterfs.com
2007-Mar-29 14:53 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11175] cleanup compiler warnings on LibLustre
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11175 I just landed 9794 on b1_4 for 1.4.11. I will investigate the differences between that and Nic''s latest patch, and also land whatever''s appropriate on HEAD.
scjody@clusterfs.com
2007-Apr-03 16:31 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11175] cleanup compiler warnings on LibLustre
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11175 (In reply to comment #41)> (From update of attachment 9954) > Looks good. Was this generated from Nic''s patch, and/or did you do a grep for > any remaining "uint[136][624]_t" in the code that might have snuck into patches > landed only for 1.6?It was generated from Nic''s patch. There are lots of uint*_t occurrences left, even in b1_4 with Nic''s patch applied. We could go through and eliminate all of them on HEAD, but I''d rather wait and see if there are any more that actually affect Cray.
scjody@clusterfs.com
2007-Apr-04 19:48 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11175] cleanup compiler warnings on LibLustre
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11175 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED "working sysio-cmn.h patch, updated against libsysio HEAD" - landed on libsysio HEAD for 1.4.11 and 1.6.1. "b1_4: bring this in line with Nic''s latest patch." - landed on b1_4 for 1.4.11. "Nic''s latest patch, ported to HEAD" - landed on HEAD for 1.6.1. Resolving.