scjody@clusterfs.com
2007-Mar-16 14:59 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11979] Please watch the 1.4.10 beta 1 build
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11979 Request ID: 1499 of v1_4_9_90 submitted.
scjody@clusterfs.com
2007-Mar-20 10:08 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11979] Please watch the 1.4.10 beta 1 build
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11979 All lbuild failures reported so far are due to missing landings. I have requested permission to merge the changes.
scjody@clusterfs.com
2007-Mar-22 12:49 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11979] Please watch the 1.4.10 beta 1 build
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11979 I have re-tagged beta 1 and submitted request 1505. Please watch it, again as a higher priority than any 1.6 builds.
scjody@clusterfs.com
2007-Mar-26 10:04 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11979] Please watch the 1.4.10 beta 1 build
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11979 You''re right, it should have been b1_4. I canceled the old request and submitted request 1509.
scjody@clusterfs.com
2007-Mar-28 12:34 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11979] Please watch the 1.4.10 beta 1 build
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11979 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED We are moving on to RC builds of 1.4.10. Unfortunately this beta was not completed.