Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11173 The filesystem was created 10/10/06, about a month before.
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11173 Created an attachment (id=9193) Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: --> (https://bugzilla.lustre.org/attachment.cgi?id=9193&action=view) e2fsck results Attached is the e2fsck result when our sys admin did the e2fsck then. The problem was on nid00012. The sys admin said they may not have captured everyting so that is all we had.
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11173 Ok, it seems we have already had the patch for the mballoc problem and there is no problem since we did the e2fsck. We can close this one now. Thanks, Wally -----