Logcheck devel - Aug 2009 - Unsure about the responsibility of Bug # 260660 - logcheck entry missing

Dear Logcheck-Team,

i'm unsure about the responsible package for this bug:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=260660

Could you please give me an update, if this should be forwarded to
logcheck?

Best regards

-- 
Stefan

also sprach Stefan Bauer <stefan.bauer at cubewerk.de> [2009.08.30.2302
+0200]:
> i'm unsure about the responsible package for this bug:
> 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=260660
> 
> Could you please give me an update, if this should be forwarded to
> logcheck?
We prefer if package maintainers take care of the rules themselves
and they are distributed with the package to which they apply.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"anyone who is capable of getting themselves made president
 should on no account be allowed to do the job"
                                                      -- douglas adams
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20090830/ba42925a/attachment.pgp>

martin f krafft schrieb:
> We prefer if package maintainers take care of the rules themselves
> and they are distributed with the package to which they apply.
I just dived through the open bugs for logcheck-database and mostly
the entries for the deamons are maintained/created by the
logcheck-database package. Additonally there are already a few
entries for oidentd, mentioned in
/etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/oidentd.

Shall i anyway modify the ignore.d.server/oidentd file by now
through the oidentd package?

-- 
Stefan