Logcheck devel - Mar 2008 - Bug#445473: Updated patch for policyd-weight ignores

In article <1205664468.6070.31.camel__42817.1906889931$1205664822$gmane$org
at denial> you wrote:
> Attached is an example log, it should contain examples for all the
> modifications i've made.
Thanks!

Your log didn't include an example for "temporarily blocked" and
"multirecipient email", but those were clear enough anyway.  I also
added "please relay via your ISP", which was not covered by your
patch.

I was intrigued by your making optional of one space and all of
client/helo/from/to in the "weighted check" rule.  Was that
intentional?


-- 
< nobse> bleh... last night I had a dream... someone NMU'ed vim...
         nightmare
		-- in #debian-devel

On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 12:58 -0400, Fr?d?ric Bri?re
wrote:
> Your log didn't include an example for "temporarily blocked"
and
> "multirecipient email", but those were clear enough anyway.  I
also
> added "please relay via your ISP", which was not covered by your
patch.
> 
> I was intrigued by your making optional of one space and all of
> client/helo/from/to in the "weighted check" rule.  Was that
intentional?
I'm pretty sure there was a reason for that, but it could be that it was
a leftover from some variation of the rule. You can leave it out and
i'll file a new bug if it's required.

Based on my current logs, it's not required.

- S

-- 
Sami Haahtinen <ressu at ressukka.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20080316/42c0412d/attachment.pgp