Sami Haahtinen
2007-Oct-07 05:07 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#445473: Updated patch for policyd-weight ignores
Hey, here is an updated patch. There is still one problem with the patch, i can't figure out how to make it drop these messages. Oct 6 22:06:57 Carbon postfix/policyd-weight[2991]: weighted check: IN_DYN_PBL_SPAMHAUS=3.25 NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 HELO_SEEMS_DIALUP=4.5 (check from: .web. - helo: .bwn108.internetdsl.tpnet. - helo-domain: .tpnet.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=1.812 CLIENT_NOT_MX/A_FROM_DOMAIN=4.75 CLIENT/24_NOT_MX/A_FROM_DOMAIN=4.75 <client=83.18.221.108> <helo=bwn108.internetdsl.tpnet.pl> <from=foobar at example.net> <to=user at example.com>, rate: 12.562 Regards, -- Sami Haahtinen <ressu at ressukka.net> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: postfix.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 3345 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20071007/efda1457/attachment.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20071007/efda1457/attachment.pgp
Frédéric Brière
2008-Mar-16 05:17 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#445473: Updated patch for policyd-weight ignores
In article <1191733636.6520.7.camel at denial> you wrote:> here is an updated patch.Could you provide a couple of sample log messages that are meant to be matched by these rules? I'm trying to make them compatible with the version in etch, and it's quite easy to get lost in them. Having a reference would help greatly. Thanks! -- Being overloaded is the sign of a true Debian maintainer. -- JHM on #Debian
Frédéric Brière
2008-Mar-16 17:01 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#445473: Updated patch for policyd-weight ignores
In article <1191733636.6520.7.camel at denial> you wrote:> There is still one problem with the patch, i can't figure out how to > make it drop these messages.That was because of 24_NOT_MX, which didn't match [[:alpha:]]. -- * JHM wonders what Joey did to earn "I'd just like to say, for the record, that Joey rules." -- Seen on #Debian