As I told you yesterday, I now have commit rights to the logcheck
CVS. My question is whether it's okay for me to just start merging
in my own bug reports, and later make fixes without filing
individual bugs. I now have the CVS mapped over /etc/logcheck on
most of my machines and it will be much easier just to commit (with
proper log messages, of course).
No need to fear that I'd make too big changes that would upset
anyone...
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
logik ist analsadismus: gedanken werden gewaltsam
durch einen engen gang gepre?t.
-- frei nach lacan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20060704/040a64c8/attachment.pgp
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 07:54:07PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:> As I told you yesterday, I now have commit rights to the logcheck > CVS. My question is whether it's okay for me to just start merging > in my own bug reports, and later make fixes without filing > individual bugs. I now have the CVS mapped over /etc/logcheck on > most of my machines and it will be much easier just to commit (with > proper log messages, of course).looking forward that you fix those bugs, concerning the directions about logcheck-database and more infrastructural stuff, we like to discuss. otherwise please just go on. :) best regards -- maks