Duncan Findlay
2006-May-07 23:24 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#366364: Logcheck files for spamd
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.44
Severity: normal
In order to consolidate the spamassassin logcheck files into one
package, as discussed with Jamie Penman-Smithson in February, I'm
going to remove the logcheck files from the next release of the
spamassassin package. I don't use logcheck, so I usually forget to
update the file until people file bug reports.
Here are the logcheck entries I think you're missing. These are part
of the normal functioning of spamd, so probably should be ignored in
all configurations:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ spamd\[[0-9]+\]:( spamd:)? got connection
over
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ spamd\[[0-9]+\]:( spamd:)? handled cleanup of
child pid [0-9]+ due to SIGCHHLD$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ spamd\[[0-9]+\]:( spamd:)? server
successfully spawned child process, pid [0-9]+$
There may be some other messages I'm missing.
The logcheck entry:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ spamd\[[0-9]+\]: prefork: child states: I+$
is a bit restrictive. Child states other than I can and will occur in the normal
functioning of spamassassin.
Thanks,
--
Duncan Findlay
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20060507/d764595e/attachment.pgp
Jamie L. Penman-Smithson
2006-Jun-04 22:10 UTC
Bug#366364: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#366364: Logcheck files for spamd
package logcheck-database tags 366364 pending thanks On 8 May 2006, at 00:24, Duncan Findlay wrote:> In order to consolidate the spamassassin logcheck files into one > package, as discussed with Jamie Penman-Smithson in February, I'm > going to remove the logcheck files from the next release of the > spamassassin package. I don't use logcheck, so I usually forget to > update the file until people file bug reports. > > Here are the logcheck entries I think you're missing. These are part > of the normal functioning of spamd, so probably should be ignored in > all configurations: > > ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ spamd\[[0-9]+\]:( spamd:)? got > connection over > ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ spamd\[[0-9]+\]:( spamd:)? > handled cleanup of child pid [0-9]+ due to SIGCHHLD$ > ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ spamd\[[0-9]+\]:( spamd:)? > server successfully spawned child process, pid [0-9]+$Thanks, I've added these to CVS.> The logcheck entry: > ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ spamd\[[0-9]+\]: prefork: child > states: I+$ > > is a bit restrictive. Child states other than I can and will occur > in the normal functioning of spamassassin.I've changed that rule to ignore all child states, since if something does go wrong there will be other messages that warn of the problem anyway. Thanks! -j -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20060604/b1db8e46/attachment.pgp
Debian Bug Tracking System
2006-Jun-04 22:18 UTC
Processed: Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#366364: Logcheck files for spamd
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:> package logcheck-databaseIgnoring bugs not assigned to: logcheck-database> tags 366364 pendingBug#366364: Logcheck files for spamd There were no tags set. Tags added: pending> thanksStopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)