Jan Braun
2006-Mar-30 17:48 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#360120: logcheck-database: logcheck-sudo should treat sudoedit no worse than "sudo vi"
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.43a Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, logcheck does not report invocations of "sudo $EDITOR /some/file", while it does report "sudoedit /some/file". That's obviously inconsistent. The patch below fixes it (by ignoring sudoedit, too). regards, Jan --- logcheck-sudo 2006-03-30 16:53:48.000000000 +0200 +++ /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-sudo 2006-03-30 16:55:35.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ sudo:[[:space:]]+[_[:alnum:]-]+ : TTY=(unknown|(pts/|tty|vc/)[0-9]+) ; PWD=.+ ; USER=[^[:space:]]+ ; COMMAND=/(usr|etc|bin|sbin)/.*$ +^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ sudo:[[:space:]]+[_[:alnum:]-]+ : TTY=(unknown|(pts/|tty|vc/)[0-9]+) ; PWD=.+ ; USER=[^[:space:]]+ ; COMMAND=(/(usr|etc|bin|sbin)/|sudoedit ).*$ -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages logcheck-database depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.72 Debian configuration management sy logcheck-database recommends no packages. -- debconf information: logcheck-database/conffile-cleanup: false * logcheck-database/rules-directories-note: logcheck-database/standard-rename-note:
Jamie L. Penman-Smithson
2006-May-03 23:14 UTC
Bug#360120: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#360120: logcheck-database: logcheck-sudo should treat sudoedit no worse than "sudo vi"
package logcheck-database tags 360120 pending thanks On 30 Mar 2006, at 18:48, Jan Braun wrote:> logcheck does not report invocations of "sudo $EDITOR /some/file", > while it > does report "sudoedit /some/file". That's obviously inconsistent. > The patch below fixes it (by ignoring sudoedit, too).<snip> Thanks for the patch. This will be included in the next release. Thanks for your bug report, -- -Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <jamie at silverdream.org> PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8 never send mail to: oubliette.z at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20060504/9dc659df/attachment.pgp
Debian Bug Tracking System
2006-May-03 23:18 UTC
Processed: Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#360120: logcheck-database: logcheck-sudo should treat sudoedit no worse than "sudo vi"
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:> package logcheck-databaseIgnoring bugs not assigned to: logcheck-database> tags 360120 pendingBug#360120: logcheck-database: logcheck-sudo should treat sudoedit no worse than "sudo vi" Tags were: patch Tags added: pending> thanksStopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)