Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev
2022-Jan-11 21:42 UTC
[llvm-dev] LLVM Infrastructure Changes - Moving to Discourse
> On Jan 11, 2022, at 1:28 AM, Kiran Chandramohan <Kiran.Chandramohan at arm.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > Having used discourse for interacting with the MLIR community, I find discourse useful and support this transition. > > I have a couple of points, > It is mentioned that the current mailing list contents will be moved to discourse. Is there a plan to match the mails of a person with their account in discourse (assuming the person already has posts in discourse and mails in the mailing list)?Good questions! Here is the plan from the Discourse migration team: Users from the archive will first be imported as users based on their email, and then they will be merged into your current Discourse site also based on their email; their ID and all user fields from our existing Discourse site will prevail. not mailman user, Discourse user --> use Discourse normally mailman user, Discourse user --> use Discourse normally; they'll see their old emails in their history as if they posted them through Discourse mailman user, not Discourse user --> will have Discourse user records created along with their old email history; reset Discourse password to start using it> The Flang project currently sits under Other Projects in discourse, can it be moved to a top-level project like Clang and MLIR in https://llvm.discourse.group/ <https://llvm.discourse.group/>?I think the general idea is to make something a top-level category when it has enough traffic and needs sub-categories itself. Flang can always be moved out from under Subprojects when it makes sense. We are trying to limit how many top-level categories we have to make things less visually cluttered. Maybe we can revisit this in a couple months when we see how things go with Flang where it is? Thanks, Tanya> Thanks, > Kiran > From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org>> on behalf of Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> > Sent: 08 January 2022 07:19 > To: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> > Subject: [llvm-dev] LLVM Infrastructure Changes - Moving to Discourse > > LLVM Community, > > I just posted a blog post about the upcoming changes to the mailing lists and LLVM Discourse forums: > https://blog.llvm.org/posts/2022-01-07-moving-to-discourse/ <https://blog.llvm.org/posts/2022-01-07-moving-to-discourse/> > > I am sure some may be anxious about this change, but I hope we can work together as a community to resolve any potential issues or help each other navigate this change. I have put the migration to discourse guide that was drafted by the Infrastructure Working Group in LLVM Docs, and encourage people to add their tips and tricks to help others migrate over. > https://llvm.org/docs/DiscourseMigrationGuide.html <https://llvm.org/docs/DiscourseMigrationGuide.html> > > If you have any questions about the plan, please let me know. > > Thanks, > Tanya > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20220111/38d6e741/attachment.html>
Kiran Chandramohan via llvm-dev
2022-Jan-12 11:00 UTC
[llvm-dev] LLVM Infrastructure Changes - Moving to Discourse
Thanks, Tanya for the reply.
"Users from the archive will first be imported as users based on their
email, and then they will be merged into your current Discourse site also based
on their email; their ID and all user fields from our existing Discourse site
will prevail.
not mailman user, Discourse user --> use Discourse normally
mailman user, Discourse user --> use Discourse normally; they'll
see their old emails in their history as if they posted them through Discourse
mailman user, not Discourse user --> will have Discourse"
In my case, I have used my Gmail account for Discourse but my company account
for the mailing list. I see in the account settings in Discourse an option for
"Add Alternate Email". Will this be sufficient? If it is the then it
would be good to advise existing discourse users to add alternate emails to
match the mailing list email.
OK with waiting for a few months to see how things go with Flang discourse
traffic.
Regards,
Kiran
________________________________
From: Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org>
Sent: 11 January 2022 21:42
To: Kiran Chandramohan <Kiran.Chandramohan at arm.com>
Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLVM Infrastructure Changes - Moving to Discourse
On Jan 11, 2022, at 1:28 AM, Kiran Chandramohan <Kiran.Chandramohan at
arm.com<mailto:Kiran.Chandramohan at arm.com>> wrote:
Hello all,
Having used discourse for interacting with the MLIR community, I find discourse
useful and support this transition.
I have a couple of points,
1. It is mentioned that the current mailing list contents will be moved to
discourse. Is there a plan to match the mails of a person with their account in
discourse (assuming the person already has posts in discourse and mails in the
mailing list)?
Good questions! Here is the plan from the Discourse migration team:
Users from the archive will first be imported as users based on their email, and
then they will be merged into your current Discourse site also based on their
email; their ID and all user fields from our existing Discourse site will
prevail.
not mailman user, Discourse user --> use Discourse normally
mailman user, Discourse user --> use Discourse normally; they'll
see their old emails in their history as if they posted them through Discourse
mailman user, not Discourse user --> will have Discourse user records
created along with their old email history; reset Discourse password to start
using it
1. The Flang project currently sits under Other Projects in discourse, can it
be moved to a top-level project like Clang and MLIR in
https://llvm.discourse.group/?
I think the general idea is to make something a top-level category when it has
enough traffic and needs sub-categories itself. Flang can always be moved out
from under Subprojects when it makes sense. We are trying to limit how many
top-level categories we have to make things less visually cluttered. Maybe we
can revisit this in a couple months when we see how things go with Flang where
it is?
Thanks,
Tanya
1.
Thanks,
Kiran
________________________________
From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev-bounces
at lists.llvm.org>> on behalf of Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev
at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
Sent: 08 January 2022 07:19
To: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org>>
Subject: [llvm-dev] LLVM Infrastructure Changes - Moving to Discourse
LLVM Community,
I just posted a blog post about the upcoming changes to the mailing lists and
LLVM Discourse forums:
https://blog.llvm.org/posts/2022-01-07-moving-to-discourse/
I am sure some may be anxious about this change, but I hope we can work together
as a community to resolve any potential issues or help each other navigate this
change. I have put the migration to discourse guide that was drafted by the
Infrastructure Working Group in LLVM Docs, and encourage people to add their
tips and tricks to help others migrate over.
https://llvm.org/docs/DiscourseMigrationGuide.html
If you have any questions about the plan, please let me know.
Thanks,
Tanya
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20220112/ae7bc878/attachment.html>