Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2021-Aug-23 17:38 UTC
[llvm-dev] Phabricator Creator Pulling the Plug
On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 18:17, MyDeveloper Day via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> But unless I missed this, was there any discussion regarding the recent > "Winding Down" announcement of Phabricator? and what it might mean for us > in LLVM >I think we have our own self-hosted version and enough local people that has hacked on it to "maintain" it, but we'd stop getting the updated from upstream, which have been substantial over the years. I don't think this should be a rush to replace with an alternative, as there is no imminent peril, but it is an additional important point for the ongoing discussion of potential transition. Personally I'm excited by the concept of a community driven replacement (> https://we.phorge.it/) . > epriestley did a truly amazing job, it wasn't open to public > contributions. Perhaps more open development could lead to closing some of > the github gaps that were of concern. >IMO, it would have to be seriously active upstream, understand our existing database "as is" and import without problems, and interface with Github more closely to be worth the hassle of migration. Github pull requests don't seem to be improving a lot, so "phorge" may be the right answer sooner than they catch up... cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20210823/d06098a3/attachment.html>
James Y Knight via llvm-dev
2021-Aug-23 17:56 UTC
[llvm-dev] Phabricator Creator Pulling the Plug
If phabricator/phorge do turn out to be non-viable in the future, I think we may want to reopen the option of moving to Gerrit for the primary code-review platform. I'll note that the Golang folks are using Gerrit as their review platform, and they have a GitHub bot setup to translate GH pull-requests into a gerrit review, so as to be friendly to first-time or drive-by contributors. See e.g. https://github.com/golang/go/pull/47766 for an example. On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:38 PM Renato Golin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 18:17, MyDeveloper Day via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> But unless I missed this, was there any discussion regarding the recent >> "Winding Down" announcement of Phabricator? and what it might mean for us >> in LLVM >> > > I think we have our own self-hosted version and enough local people that > has hacked on it to "maintain" it, but we'd stop getting the updated from > upstream, which have been substantial over the years. > > I don't think this should be a rush to replace with an alternative, as > there is no imminent peril, but it is an additional important point for the > ongoing discussion of potential transition. > > Personally I'm excited by the concept of a community driven replacement ( >> https://we.phorge.it/) . >> epriestley did a truly amazing job, it wasn't open to public >> contributions. Perhaps more open development could lead to closing some of >> the github gaps that were of concern. >> > > IMO, it would have to be seriously active upstream, understand our > existing database "as is" and import without problems, and interface with > Github more closely to be worth the hassle of migration. > > Github pull requests don't seem to be improving a lot, so "phorge" may be > the right answer sooner than they catch up... > > cheers, > --renato > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20210823/252549a3/attachment.html>