Paul C. Anagnostopoulos via llvm-dev
2020-Dec-04 00:19 UTC
[llvm-dev] Question about std::map
I have the following map: std::map<std::string, std::vector<Record *>> ClassRecordsMap; I call a function that builds a new vector of <Record *> and returns it. const auto Records = getAllDerivedDefinitions(makeArrayRef(ClassName)); What is the best way to add it to the map, being careful not to copy it? This is what I'm doing now: ClassRecordsMap[ClassNameString] = std::move(Records);
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:19 PM Paul C. Anagnostopoulos via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> I have the following map: > > std::map<std::string, std::vector<Record *>> ClassRecordsMap; > > I call a function that builds a new vector of <Record *> and returns it. > > const auto Records = getAllDerivedDefinitions(makeArrayRef(ClassName)); >This would be one of the times where using top level const on local variables will make things less good. You can't move from Records if it's const like that. (generally I don't think it's practical to use top level const in C++ pervasively - so I'd suggest generally not doing it, because doing it only sometimes may make things harder to read ("why is /this/ particular local variable const when lots of others aren't?" the future reader will ask themselves))> > What is the best way to add it to the map, being careful not to copy it? > This is what I'm doing now: > > ClassRecordsMap[ClassNameString] = std::move(Records); >Yep, generally that'll do it. If you want to avoid even a default construction of std::vector (it's cheap, there's unlikely to be any reason to avoid that) you could use emplace: ClassRecordsMap.try_emplace(ClassNameString, std::move(Records));> > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201203/2a3f2688/attachment.html>