On Mon Nov 2, 2020 at 7:56 PM GMT, Johannes Doerfert wrote:> Last time I removed the getenv calls, as an Aprils fool joke btw [1], > I ended up with a compiler that was unable to do a stage 2 build, IIRC. > > [1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131466.html >Wonderful! When I asked about this internally, a colleague said they were going to create a platform where `getenv` can return `-1`. -- Codeplay Software Ltd. Company registered in England and Wales, number: 04567874 Registered office: Regent House, 316 Beulah Hill, London, SE19 3HF
Replacing the getenv with this ought to be sufficient:
volatile int opaque_flag = 0;
if (!opaque_flag) return;
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 4:25 PM Luke Drummond via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Mon Nov 2, 2020 at 7:56 PM GMT, Johannes Doerfert wrote:
>
> > Last time I removed the getenv calls, as an Aprils fool joke btw [1],
> > I ended up with a compiler that was unable to do a stage 2 build,
IIRC.
> >
> > [1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131466.html
> >
> Wonderful! When I asked about this internally, a colleague said they were
> going
> to create a platform where `getenv` can return `-1`.
>
> --
> Codeplay Software Ltd.
> Company registered in England and Wales, number: 04567874
> Registered office: Regent House, 316 Beulah Hill, London, SE19 3HF
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201102/a3db8d26/attachment.html>
This seems like a good approach. -Chris> On Nov 2, 2020, at 1:32 PM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Replacing the getenv with this ought to be sufficient: > volatile int opaque_flag = 0; > if (!opaque_flag) return; > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 4:25 PM Luke Drummond via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > On Mon Nov 2, 2020 at 7:56 PM GMT, Johannes Doerfert wrote: > > > Last time I removed the getenv calls, as an Aprils fool joke btw [1], > > I ended up with a compiler that was unable to do a stage 2 build, IIRC. > > > > [1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131466.html <https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131466.html> > > > Wonderful! When I asked about this internally, a colleague said they were going > to create a platform where `getenv` can return `-1`. > > -- > Codeplay Software Ltd. > Company registered in England and Wales, number: 04567874 > Registered office: Regent House, 316 Beulah Hill, London, SE19 3HF > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev> > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201103/92665e52/attachment.html>