Chris Lattner via llvm-dev
2020-Mar-06 18:47 UTC
[llvm-dev] [PITCH] Improvements to LLVM Decision Making
Hi Christian, I’m sorry, but this is still on my todo list. I’ve been a bit DoS’d lately, but I do hope to come back to this soon. -Chris> On Feb 21, 2020, at 4:24 AM, Christian Kühnel <kuhnel at google.com> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Did you reach any decision on how to move forward? > I would be happy if we get this (or something similar) started... > > > Best, > Christian > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:58 AM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Numerous people have been bringing up challenges with consensus driven decision making in the LLVM community. After considering this and seeing the frustrations it is causing many people, I think we should make a formal process change to help improve decision making going forward. > > Here is the outline of the draft proposal <https://gist.github.com/lattner/e3679998a7609c99b1243f09d30f0132>. Caveats: this is itself just a draft proposal to inspire discussion not a mandate - I welcome feedback, thoughts and concerns, ideas of how to make this better, or better ideas/approaches overall on how we can level up the community. > > Please let me know what you think, thanks! > > -Chris > > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200306/7fe25c54/attachment.html>
Christian Kühnel via llvm-dev
2020-May-19 12:16 UTC
[llvm-dev] [PITCH] Improvements to LLVM Decision Making
Hi Chris, I think this is a really important topic. Is there anything I can do to move this forward? Best, Christian On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 7:47 PM Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org> wrote:> Hi Christian, > > I’m sorry, but this is still on my todo list. I’ve been a bit DoS’d > lately, but I do hope to come back to this soon. > > -Chris > > On Feb 21, 2020, at 4:24 AM, Christian Kühnel <kuhnel at google.com> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Did you reach any decision on how to move forward? > I would be happy if we get this (or something similar) started... > > > Best, > Christian > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:58 AM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> Numerous people have been bringing up challenges with consensus driven >> decision making in the LLVM community. After considering this and seeing >> the frustrations it is causing many people, I think we should make a formal >> process change to help improve decision making going forward. >> >> Here is the outline of the draft proposal >> <https://gist.github.com/lattner/e3679998a7609c99b1243f09d30f0132>. >> Caveats: this is itself just a draft proposal to inspire discussion not a >> mandate - I welcome feedback, thoughts and concerns, ideas of how to make >> this better, or better ideas/approaches overall on how we can level up the >> community. >> >> Please let me know what you think, thanks! >> >> -Chris >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200519/e6e0964a/attachment.html>
Chris Lattner via llvm-dev
2020-May-21 21:53 UTC
[llvm-dev] [PITCH] Improvements to LLVM Decision Making
Hi Christian, Thank you for the nudge, I’ll try to write up some thoughts this weekend. If I don’t get something out, please give me a hard time about it on Monday :-) :-) -Chris> On May 19, 2020, at 5:16 AM, Christian Kühnel <kuhnel at google.com> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > I think this is a really important topic. Is there anything I can do to move this forward? > > Best, > Christian > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 7:47 PM Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org <mailto:clattner at nondot.org>> wrote: > Hi Christian, > > I’m sorry, but this is still on my todo list. I’ve been a bit DoS’d lately, but I do hope to come back to this soon. > > -Chris > >> On Feb 21, 2020, at 4:24 AM, Christian Kühnel <kuhnel at google.com <mailto:kuhnel at google.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> Did you reach any decision on how to move forward? >> I would be happy if we get this (or something similar) started... >> >> >> Best, >> Christian >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:58 AM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> Numerous people have been bringing up challenges with consensus driven decision making in the LLVM community. After considering this and seeing the frustrations it is causing many people, I think we should make a formal process change to help improve decision making going forward. >> >> Here is the outline of the draft proposal <https://gist.github.com/lattner/e3679998a7609c99b1243f09d30f0132>. Caveats: this is itself just a draft proposal to inspire discussion not a mandate - I welcome feedback, thoughts and concerns, ideas of how to make this better, or better ideas/approaches overall on how we can level up the community. >> >> Please let me know what you think, thanks! >> >> -Chris >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200521/bc84529f/attachment.html>