Tom Honermann via llvm-dev
2020-Feb-25 17:27 UTC
[llvm-dev] Status of the git.llvm.org git repos
I was under the impression that the (non-monorepo) separate LLVM and Clang git repos hosted at git.llvm.org would be maintained for a year after the transition to the mono repo. I don't recall where I got that impression from; probably from some of the many emails on the migration topic. I noticed today that updates to these repos ceased on October 22nd of last year following transition to the mono repo. Was I simply mistaken that these repos were not going to be maintained along with the (read-only) svn repo? We had not planned to complete our own transition to the mono repo until a little later this year, but if these repos are no longer maintained, we'll have to readjust our priorities. I'm aware of the guidance on how to transition (https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#moving-local-branches-to-the-monorepo) and am not seeking any advice on how to do so. Tom. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200225/3a7aa6d9/attachment.html>
Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev
2020-Feb-25 17:36 UTC
[llvm-dev] Status of the git.llvm.org git repos
Hello These repos were populated from SVN. Noone worked on migration of them to be pulled from monorepo as far as I know. On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 8:28 PM Tom Honermann via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> > I was under the impression that the (non-monorepo) separate LLVM and Clang git repos hosted at git.llvm.org would be maintained for a year after the transition to the mono repo. I don't recall where I got that impression from; probably from some of the many emails on the migration topic. I noticed today that updates to these repos ceased on October 22nd of last year following transition to the mono repo. Was I simply mistaken that these repos were not going to be maintained along with the (read-only) svn repo? We had not planned to complete our own transition to the mono repo until a little later this year, but if these repos are no longer maintained, we'll have to readjust our priorities. > > > > I'm aware of the guidance on how to transition (https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#moving-local-branches-to-the-monorepo) and am not seeking any advice on how to do so. > > > > Tom. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Department of Statistical Modelling, Saint Petersburg State University -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200225/248ca17d/attachment.html>
Tom Honermann via llvm-dev
2020-Feb-25 17:50 UTC
[llvm-dev] Status of the git.llvm.org git repos
My expectation was that they would continue to be fed from the updates to the svn repo. But again, I don't recall where I got that impression from. It may have been a bad assumption on my part. Tom. From: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 12:36 PM To: Tom Honermann <thonerma at synopsys.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Michael Price <mprice at synopsys.com>; Tim Prince <trprince at synopsys.com>; Christopher Lapkowski <lapkow at synopsys.com> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Status of the git.llvm.org git repos Hello These repos were populated from SVN. Noone worked on migration of them to be pulled from monorepo as far as I know. On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 8:28 PM Tom Honermann via llvm-dev wrote:> > I was under the impression that the (non-monorepo) separate LLVM and Clang git repos hosted at git.llvm.org would be maintained for a year after the transition to the mono repo. I don't recall where I got that impression from; probably from some of the many emails on the migration topic. I noticed today that updates to these repos ceased on October 22nd of last year following transition to the mono repo. Was I simply mistaken that these repos were not going to be maintained along with the (read-only) svn repo? We had not planned to complete our own transition to the mono repo until a little later this year, but if these repos are no longer maintained, we'll have to readjust our priorities. > > > > I'm aware of the guidance on how to transition (https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#moving-local-branches-to-the-monorepo) and am not seeking any advice on how to do so. > > > > Tom. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Department of Statistical Modelling, Saint Petersburg State University -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200225/c54134fb/attachment.html>