david via llvm-dev
2020-Jan-22 14:28 UTC
[llvm-dev] appropriate substitution for nvvm_atomic_load_add_f32?
I notice nvvm_atomic_load_add_f32 was removed. Is there a well known substitution for atomic_load_add? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200122/27879d49/attachment.html>
Nicolai Hähnle via llvm-dev
2020-Jan-28 12:48 UTC
[llvm-dev] appropriate substitution for nvvm_atomic_load_add_f32?
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 3:28 PM david via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> I notice nvvm_atomic_load_add_f32 was removed. Is there a well known substitution for atomic_load_add?I don't know the specifics of this intrinsic and backend, but the native IR atomicrmw instruction has grown fadd/fsub operation support, so that seems like it ought to be the canonical replacement. Cheers, Nicolai> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-- Lerne, wie die Welt wirklich ist, aber vergiss niemals, wie sie sein sollte.