Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
2019-Dec-10 14:53 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 9.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
On 12/10/2019 12:06 AM, Tobias Hieta wrote:> Hello, > > I finally figured out that I still need Python 2.7 in order to get > tests running correctly on macOS. But this lead to a bunch of test > fails when using the script: > > FAIL: LLVM :: Bindings/Go/go.test (23671 of 61786)I've seen this go failure before on macOS, so it is somewhat expected. Do the rest of these tests fail with 9.0.0 too ? -Tom> FAIL: ThreadSanitizer-x86_64 :: Darwin/norace-objcxx-run-time.mm > (52223 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/assign.pass.cpp > (55919 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/ctor_copy.pass.cpp > (55920 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/ctor_default.pass.cpp > (55921 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/rethrow_if_nested.pass.cpp > (55922 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/rethrow_nested.pass.cpp > (55924 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: > std/language.support/support.exception/propagation/make_exception_ptr.pass.cpp > (55933 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: > std/language.support/support.exception/propagation/rethrow_exception.pass.cpp > (55934 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.promise/dtor.pass.cpp > (57862 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: > std/thread/futures/futures.promise/set_exception.pass.cpp (57866 of > 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: > std/thread/futures/futures.promise/set_exception_at_thread_exit.pass.cpp > (57867 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.async/async.pass.cpp (57895 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.shared_future/get.pass.cpp > (57899 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: > std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/dtor.pass.cpp > (57902 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: > std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/make_ready_at_thread_exit.pass.cpp > (57913 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: > std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/operator.pass.cpp > (57915 of 61786) > FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.unique_future/get.pass.cpp > (57922 of 61786) > > Are these expected or should they be followed up on somehow? I am > sorry I am not more useful here - I have a fast mac pro that can run > the builds and tests but I am not to plugged into to the rest of the > internals and release process. If it's not useful that I work on this > let me know. > > The binaries can still be downloaded from my GDrive: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/19sV_IUYC6WxmgR0SYEL4wEYd90jEPHo0/view?usp=sharing > SHA256: 1a8c62bc37962abc90f4caee9620dc01e4413196c344a9472dfc6f0dc9fd1176 > > Thanks, > Tobias > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 4:03 AM Tom Stellard via Release-testers > <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I've tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc2. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. >> If all goes well, this will be the last -rc. >> >> -Tom >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Release-testers mailing list >> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers >
Tobias Hieta via llvm-dev
2019-Dec-10 16:24 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 9.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
Good idea. I'll start a 9.0.0 build to see. On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 15:53 Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote:> On 12/10/2019 12:06 AM, Tobias Hieta wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I finally figured out that I still need Python 2.7 in order to get > > tests running correctly on macOS. But this lead to a bunch of test > > fails when using the script: > > > > FAIL: LLVM :: Bindings/Go/go.test (23671 of 61786) > > I've seen this go failure before on macOS, so it is somewhat expected. > Do the rest of these tests fail with 9.0.0 too ? > > -Tom > > > FAIL: ThreadSanitizer-x86_64 :: Darwin/norace-objcxx-run-time.mm > > (52223 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: > > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/assign.pass.cpp > > (55919 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: > > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/ctor_copy.pass.cpp > > (55920 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: > > > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/ctor_default.pass.cpp > > (55921 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: > > > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/rethrow_if_nested.pass.cpp > > (55922 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: > > > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/rethrow_nested.pass.cpp > > (55924 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: > > > std/language.support/support.exception/propagation/make_exception_ptr.pass.cpp > > (55933 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: > > > std/language.support/support.exception/propagation/rethrow_exception.pass.cpp > > (55934 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.promise/dtor.pass.cpp > > (57862 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: > > std/thread/futures/futures.promise/set_exception.pass.cpp (57866 of > > 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: > > std/thread/futures/futures.promise/set_exception_at_thread_exit.pass.cpp > > (57867 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.async/async.pass.cpp (57895 > of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.shared_future/get.pass.cpp > > (57899 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: > > std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/dtor.pass.cpp > > (57902 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: > > > std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/make_ready_at_thread_exit.pass.cpp > > (57913 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: > > std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/operator.pass.cpp > > (57915 of 61786) > > FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.unique_future/get.pass.cpp > > (57922 of 61786) > > > > Are these expected or should they be followed up on somehow? I am > > sorry I am not more useful here - I have a fast mac pro that can run > > the builds and tests but I am not to plugged into to the rest of the > > internals and release process. If it's not useful that I work on this > > let me know. > > > > The binaries can still be downloaded from my GDrive: > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/19sV_IUYC6WxmgR0SYEL4wEYd90jEPHo0/view?usp=sharing > > SHA256: 1a8c62bc37962abc90f4caee9620dc01e4413196c344a9472dfc6f0dc9fd1176 > > > > Thanks, > > Tobias > > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 4:03 AM Tom Stellard via Release-testers > > <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc2. Testers can begin testing and uploading > binaries. > >> If all goes well, this will be the last -rc. > >> > >> -Tom > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Release-testers mailing list > >> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org > >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers > > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191210/50566673/attachment.html>
Tobias Hieta via llvm-dev
2019-Dec-10 19:50 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 9.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
Tom, Seems like the same test failures happened on 9.0.0: FAIL: LLVM :: Bindings/Go/go.test (22699 of 61768) FAIL: ThreadSanitizer-x86_64 :: Darwin/norace-objcxx-run-time.mm (52206 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/assign.pass.cpp (55902 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/ctor_copy.pass.cpp (55903 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/ctor_default.pass.cpp (55904 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/rethrow_if_nested.pass.cpp (55905 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/rethrow_nested.pass.cpp (55906 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/propagation/make_exception_ptr.pass.cpp (55916 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/language.support/support.exception/propagation/rethrow_exception.pass.cpp (55917 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.promise/dtor.pass.cpp (57845 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.promise/set_exception.pass.cpp (57848 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.promise/set_exception_at_thread_exit.pass.cpp (57851 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.async/async.pass.cpp (57880 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.shared_future/get.pass.cpp (57882 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/dtor.pass.cpp (57884 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/make_ready_at_thread_exit.pass.cpp (57895 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/operator.pass.cpp (57897 of 61768) FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.unique_future/get.pass.cpp (57904 of 61768) I am guessing we should file bugs for these? But not block 9.0.1 on it. Thanks, Tobias On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 5:24 PM Tobias Hieta <tobias at plexapp.com> wrote:> > Good idea. I'll start a 9.0.0 build to see. > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 15:53 Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 12/10/2019 12:06 AM, Tobias Hieta wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I finally figured out that I still need Python 2.7 in order to get >> > tests running correctly on macOS. But this lead to a bunch of test >> > fails when using the script: >> > >> > FAIL: LLVM :: Bindings/Go/go.test (23671 of 61786) >> >> I've seen this go failure before on macOS, so it is somewhat expected. >> Do the rest of these tests fail with 9.0.0 too ? >> >> -Tom >> >> > FAIL: ThreadSanitizer-x86_64 :: Darwin/norace-objcxx-run-time.mm >> > (52223 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: >> > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/assign.pass.cpp >> > (55919 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: >> > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/ctor_copy.pass.cpp >> > (55920 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: >> > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/ctor_default.pass.cpp >> > (55921 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: >> > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/rethrow_if_nested.pass.cpp >> > (55922 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: >> > std/language.support/support.exception/except.nested/rethrow_nested.pass.cpp >> > (55924 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: >> > std/language.support/support.exception/propagation/make_exception_ptr.pass.cpp >> > (55933 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: >> > std/language.support/support.exception/propagation/rethrow_exception.pass.cpp >> > (55934 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.promise/dtor.pass.cpp >> > (57862 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: >> > std/thread/futures/futures.promise/set_exception.pass.cpp (57866 of >> > 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: >> > std/thread/futures/futures.promise/set_exception_at_thread_exit.pass.cpp >> > (57867 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.async/async.pass.cpp (57895 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.shared_future/get.pass.cpp >> > (57899 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: >> > std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/dtor.pass.cpp >> > (57902 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: >> > std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/make_ready_at_thread_exit.pass.cpp >> > (57913 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: >> > std/thread/futures/futures.task/futures.task.members/operator.pass.cpp >> > (57915 of 61786) >> > FAIL: libc++ :: std/thread/futures/futures.unique_future/get.pass.cpp >> > (57922 of 61786) >> > >> > Are these expected or should they be followed up on somehow? I am >> > sorry I am not more useful here - I have a fast mac pro that can run >> > the builds and tests but I am not to plugged into to the rest of the >> > internals and release process. If it's not useful that I work on this >> > let me know. >> > >> > The binaries can still be downloaded from my GDrive: >> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/19sV_IUYC6WxmgR0SYEL4wEYd90jEPHo0/view?usp=sharing >> > SHA256: 1a8c62bc37962abc90f4caee9620dc01e4413196c344a9472dfc6f0dc9fd1176 >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Tobias >> > >> > On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 4:03 AM Tom Stellard via Release-testers >> > <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I've tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc2. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. >> >> If all goes well, this will be the last -rc. >> >> >> >> -Tom >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Release-testers mailing list >> >> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org >> >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers >> > >>