Craig Topper via llvm-dev
2019-Dec-09 22:26 UTC
[llvm-dev] [FPEnv] Do we need constrained/strict versions of these intrinsics?
I was thinking about a few less common floating point things and wondered if we need constrained/strict versions of them. -int_fmuladd - which is used by clang to support fp-contract=on where only operations within a statement sare allowed to be concentrated. -int_convert_to_fp16/int_convert_from_fp16 - Used by some targets to support ieee 16-bit floats as a storage only type I think. A FIXME in clang indicates the plan was to get rid of these all together, but I'm not sure where we are on that. -Not an intrinsic, but we also have ISD::FP16_TO_FP and ISD::FP_TO_FP16 in SelectionDAG. I believe these are created during type legalization if half needs to be promoted. ~Craig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191209/23f90d7a/attachment.html>