Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
2019-Oct-16 18:55 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week
On 10/16/2019 07:31 AM, Roman Lebedev wrote:> +1, please. > > Also, putting a tag on the *first* commit in the repo, > and doing `git describe --match FIRST_COMMIT_TAG` will be *great*! >Do we need to add a tag or is `git rev-list --count HEAD` good enough? -Tom> Roman. > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:23 PM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> +1. And put it in the email (subject?). While it’s possible to derive a count from a hash manually, better to have it in the email in the first place. You can’t rely on order-of-email-delivery to reflect order-of-commit. >> >> --paulr >> >> >> >> From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev >> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 1:42 AM >> To: tstellar at redhat.com; Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> >> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>; openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org) <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org>; LLDB Dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week >> >> >> >> I thought we were just going to count commits on a particular branch and use the (branch name, commit count) tuple as our monotonic incrementing identifier? https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#on-managing-revision-numbers-with-git >> >> >> >> >> >> From: cfe-dev <cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> Organization: Red Hat >> Reply-To: "tstellar at redhat.com" <tstellar at redhat.com> >> Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 at 10:13 PM >> To: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> >> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org)" <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org>, LLDB Dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week >> >> >> >> On 10/15/2019 09:44 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:33 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com <mailto:tstellar at redhat.com>> wrote: >> >> On 10/15/2019 09:24 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote: >> >> > Hi Tom. >> >> > >> >> > One issue with this is that we don't have a clear "ordering" from linear revision numbers from these emails. Have we looked into continuing to generate our own emails per commits instead so that we control the format? >> >> > >> >> This actually what we are doing, we are listening for github commit events and >> >> then generating our own emails based on the data in the event. We can format >> >> the emails how ever we want, and we tried to match the current SVN format exactly. >> >> Ah great! >> >> >> >> Is the some other information you would like to have in the emails to show the >> >> ordering? >> >> The only thing I was looking to get was to continue to have a monotonic incrementing integer for the revision instead of the git hash alone: I don't know if `git llvm` has this feature yet but this was discussed a while ago (I don't remember if we just mentioned counting the commits in the repo from the beginning or using an invocation of `git describe` or something derived). >> >> >> >> We talked about using `git describe` for this, but this would require that we >> >> add tags to the master branch each time the version number was bumped. We >> >> discussed this[1] last year, but deferred the decision, since we couldn't get >> >> consensus on the tag name. >> >> >> >> -Tom >> >> >> >> [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.llvm.org_pipermail_llvm-2Ddev_2018-2DDecember_128484.html&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=p_75z-WV3dFcBRoqs2YeTexKxeCf8oyS-atIo6wG6Fg&e>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Mehdi >> >> >> >> -Tom >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Mehdi >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:07 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>>> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > We are going to start to switching from SVN commit emails to GitHub commit >> >> > emails this week. The only real change you should notice is that >> >> > the revision number in the subject will be replaced with a git hash and >> >> > the diff links in the email will point to GitHub. Otherwise the >> >> > content and format of the email should be the same. >> >> > >> >> > We are going to start by rolling this out for the openmp-commits list >> >> > and then once that's working begin migrating the rest of the lists. If you >> >> > notice any issues with the new emails, please file a bug and mark it >> >> > as a blocker of the github meta-bug (llvm.org/PR39393 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_PR39393&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=eX8PTSE7QycIi5KeESJj4VzteOcs9k7RANSWPgiiQ2Q&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_PR39393&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=eX8PTSE7QycIi5KeESJj4VzteOcs9k7RANSWPgiiQ2Q&e= >). >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Tom >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > cfe-dev mailing list >> >> > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> >> >> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_cfe-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=xRFk9gEi6pLejTNAvlPR6gtikLoWNgyvL7b-TAvUcnc&e>> >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> cfe-dev mailing list >> >> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org >> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_cfe-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=xRFk9gEi6pLejTNAvlPR6gtikLoWNgyvL7b-TAvUcnc&e>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev
2019-Oct-16 19:02 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:55 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote:> > On 10/16/2019 07:31 AM, Roman Lebedev wrote: > > +1, please. > > > > Also, putting a tag on the *first* commit in the repo, > > and doing `git describe --match FIRST_COMMIT_TAG` will be *great*! > > > > Do we need to add a tag or is `git rev-list --count HEAD` > good enough?Ah, interesting, that works too, better than nothing. But to be noted that number is different from the `llvm-svn: <>` for the current commit.> -TomRoman> > Roman. > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:23 PM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> +1. And put it in the email (subject?). While it’s possible to derive a count from a hash manually, better to have it in the email in the first place. You can’t rely on order-of-email-delivery to reflect order-of-commit. > >> > >> --paulr > >> > >> > >> > >> From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 1:42 AM > >> To: tstellar at redhat.com; Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> > >> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>; openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org) <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org>; LLDB Dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> > >> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week > >> > >> > >> > >> I thought we were just going to count commits on a particular branch and use the (branch name, commit count) tuple as our monotonic incrementing identifier? https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#on-managing-revision-numbers-with-git > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: cfe-dev <cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> > >> Organization: Red Hat > >> Reply-To: "tstellar at redhat.com" <tstellar at redhat.com> > >> Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 at 10:13 PM > >> To: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> > >> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org)" <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org>, LLDB Dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> > >> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week > >> > >> > >> > >> On 10/15/2019 09:44 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:33 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com <mailto:tstellar at redhat.com>> wrote: > >> > >> On 10/15/2019 09:24 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Tom. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > One issue with this is that we don't have a clear "ordering" from linear revision numbers from these emails. Have we looked into continuing to generate our own emails per commits instead so that we control the format? > >> > >> > > >> > >> This actually what we are doing, we are listening for github commit events and > >> > >> then generating our own emails based on the data in the event. We can format > >> > >> the emails how ever we want, and we tried to match the current SVN format exactly. > >> > >> Ah great! > >> > >> > >> > >> Is the some other information you would like to have in the emails to show the > >> > >> ordering? > >> > >> The only thing I was looking to get was to continue to have a monotonic incrementing integer for the revision instead of the git hash alone: I don't know if `git llvm` has this feature yet but this was discussed a while ago (I don't remember if we just mentioned counting the commits in the repo from the beginning or using an invocation of `git describe` or something derived). > >> > >> > >> > >> We talked about using `git describe` for this, but this would require that we > >> > >> add tags to the master branch each time the version number was bumped. We > >> > >> discussed this[1] last year, but deferred the decision, since we couldn't get > >> > >> consensus on the tag name. > >> > >> > >> > >> -Tom > >> > >> > >> > >> [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.llvm.org_pipermail_llvm-2Ddev_2018-2DDecember_128484.html&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=p_75z-WV3dFcBRoqs2YeTexKxeCf8oyS-atIo6wG6Fg&e> >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Mehdi > >> > >> > >> > >> -Tom > >> > >> > Thanks, > >> > >> > > >> > >> > -- > >> > >> > Mehdi > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:07 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>>> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > >> > > >> > >> > We are going to start to switching from SVN commit emails to GitHub commit > >> > >> > emails this week. The only real change you should notice is that > >> > >> > the revision number in the subject will be replaced with a git hash and > >> > >> > the diff links in the email will point to GitHub. Otherwise the > >> > >> > content and format of the email should be the same. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > We are going to start by rolling this out for the openmp-commits list > >> > >> > and then once that's working begin migrating the rest of the lists. If you > >> > >> > notice any issues with the new emails, please file a bug and mark it > >> > >> > as a blocker of the github meta-bug (llvm.org/PR39393 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_PR39393&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=eX8PTSE7QycIi5KeESJj4VzteOcs9k7RANSWPgiiQ2Q&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_PR39393&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=eX8PTSE7QycIi5KeESJj4VzteOcs9k7RANSWPgiiQ2Q&e= >). > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Thanks, > >> > >> > Tom > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > >> > cfe-dev mailing list > >> > >> > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> > >> > >> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_cfe-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=xRFk9gEi6pLejTNAvlPR6gtikLoWNgyvL7b-TAvUcnc&e> >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> > >> cfe-dev mailing list > >> > >> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org > >> > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_cfe-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=xRFk9gEi6pLejTNAvlPR6gtikLoWNgyvL7b-TAvUcnc&e> >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> LLVM Developers mailing list > >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >
Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
2019-Oct-16 19:14 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week
On 10/16/2019 12:02 PM, Roman Lebedev wrote:> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:55 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 10/16/2019 07:31 AM, Roman Lebedev wrote: >>> +1, please. >>> >>> Also, putting a tag on the *first* commit in the repo, >>> and doing `git describe --match FIRST_COMMIT_TAG` will be *great*! >>> >> >> Do we need to add a tag or is `git rev-list --count HEAD` >> good enough? > Ah, interesting, that works too, better than nothing. > But to be noted that number is different from the `llvm-svn: <>` for > the current commit. >This is expected. There were a few commits that were filtered out in the SVN to git conversion: https://github.com/jyknight/llvm-git-migration/blob/master/llvm-svn2git-monorepo.rules -Tom>> -Tom > Roman > >>> Roman. >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:23 PM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev >>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1. And put it in the email (subject?). While it’s possible to derive a count from a hash manually, better to have it in the email in the first place. You can’t rely on order-of-email-delivery to reflect order-of-commit. >>>> >>>> --paulr >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev >>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 1:42 AM >>>> To: tstellar at redhat.com; Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> >>>> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>; openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org) <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org>; LLDB Dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I thought we were just going to count commits on a particular branch and use the (branch name, commit count) tuple as our monotonic incrementing identifier? https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#on-managing-revision-numbers-with-git >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: cfe-dev <cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> >>>> Organization: Red Hat >>>> Reply-To: "tstellar at redhat.com" <tstellar at redhat.com> >>>> Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 at 10:13 PM >>>> To: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> >>>> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org)" <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org>, LLDB Dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/15/2019 09:44 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:33 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com <mailto:tstellar at redhat.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 10/15/2019 09:24 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi Tom. >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > One issue with this is that we don't have a clear "ordering" from linear revision numbers from these emails. Have we looked into continuing to generate our own emails per commits instead so that we control the format? >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> This actually what we are doing, we are listening for github commit events and >>>> >>>> then generating our own emails based on the data in the event. We can format >>>> >>>> the emails how ever we want, and we tried to match the current SVN format exactly. >>>> >>>> Ah great! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Is the some other information you would like to have in the emails to show the >>>> >>>> ordering? >>>> >>>> The only thing I was looking to get was to continue to have a monotonic incrementing integer for the revision instead of the git hash alone: I don't know if `git llvm` has this feature yet but this was discussed a while ago (I don't remember if we just mentioned counting the commits in the repo from the beginning or using an invocation of `git describe` or something derived). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We talked about using `git describe` for this, but this would require that we >>>> >>>> add tags to the master branch each time the version number was bumped. We >>>> >>>> discussed this[1] last year, but deferred the decision, since we couldn't get >>>> >>>> consensus on the tag name. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Tom >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.llvm.org_pipermail_llvm-2Ddev_2018-2DDecember_128484.html&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=p_75z-WV3dFcBRoqs2YeTexKxeCf8oyS-atIo6wG6Fg&e>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Mehdi >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Tom >>>> >>>> > Thanks, >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > -- >>>> >>>> > Mehdi >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:07 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > Hi, >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > We are going to start to switching from SVN commit emails to GitHub commit >>>> >>>> > emails this week. The only real change you should notice is that >>>> >>>> > the revision number in the subject will be replaced with a git hash and >>>> >>>> > the diff links in the email will point to GitHub. Otherwise the >>>> >>>> > content and format of the email should be the same. >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > We are going to start by rolling this out for the openmp-commits list >>>> >>>> > and then once that's working begin migrating the rest of the lists. If you >>>> >>>> > notice any issues with the new emails, please file a bug and mark it >>>> >>>> > as a blocker of the github meta-bug (llvm.org/PR39393 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_PR39393&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=eX8PTSE7QycIi5KeESJj4VzteOcs9k7RANSWPgiiQ2Q&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_PR39393&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=eX8PTSE7QycIi5KeESJj4VzteOcs9k7RANSWPgiiQ2Q&e= >). >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > Thanks, >>>> >>>> > Tom >>>> >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> > cfe-dev mailing list >>>> >>>> > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> >>>> >>>> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_cfe-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=xRFk9gEi6pLejTNAvlPR6gtikLoWNgyvL7b-TAvUcnc&e>>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> cfe-dev mailing list >>>> >>>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org >>>> >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_cfe-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=xRFk9gEi6pLejTNAvlPR6gtikLoWNgyvL7b-TAvUcnc&e>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >>