llvm dev - Sep 2019 - clang.exp/gn

Hello,

I was wondering who owns the clang.exp bots which builds llvm using gn?
I need to add another generator to clang-tablegen, but the build seems
to be failing:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn/builds/4816

I'd appreciate it if someone could take a look at the problem.

Thank you,
Nandor Licker

The maintenance of the gn build is not a responsibility of LLVM contributors who
don't use it. It should not block you form committing the patches you need,
and the bot failing due to build system updates isn't your responsibility to
fix. There are a group of contributors who maintain the build for their own
workflows, and they will fix the failure when they get a chance.

Since it is a holiday weekend in the US the contributors who maintain the gn
build may not get around to fixing it until Tuesday.

-Chris
> On Aug 30, 2019, at 7:00 PM, Nandor Licker via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I was wondering who owns the clang.exp bots which builds llvm using gn?
> I need to add another generator to clang-tablegen, but the build seems
> to be failing:
> 
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn/builds/4816
> 
> I'd appreciate it if someone could take a look at the problem.
> 
> Thank you,
> Nandor Licker
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

Like every time: Vitaly, please remove that bot.

Nandor: The "exp" in "clang.exp" means
"experimental", they don't have to
be kept green. We still shouldn't have a GN bot on the llvm waterfall, not
even on ".exp".

(FWIW, I had emailed Nandor before this email already – I monitor commits
to llvm/utils/gn and tell everyone who lands something there that it's not
required. It doesn't happen very often.)

On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 11:52 AM Chris Bieneman <chris.bieneman at me.com>
wrote:
> The maintenance of the gn build is not a responsibility of LLVM
> contributors who don't use it. It should not block you form committing
the
> patches you need, and the bot failing due to build system updates isn't
> your responsibility to fix. There are a group of contributors who maintain
> the build for their own workflows, and they will fix the failure when they
> get a chance.
>
> Since it is a holiday weekend in the US the contributors who maintain the
> gn build may not get around to fixing it until Tuesday.
>
> -Chris
>
> > On Aug 30, 2019, at 7:00 PM, Nandor Licker via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was wondering who owns the clang.exp bots which builds llvm using
gn?
> > I need to add another generator to clang-tablegen, but the build seems
> > to be failing:
> >
> >
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-gn/builds/4816
> >
> > I'd appreciate it if someone could take a look at the problem.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Nandor Licker
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190901/2c95e8a2/attachment.html>