Thanks Praveen. Is it suitable for LLVM 7.0.1 ? Apart from flexibility, do we see any compile time improvements as well with ORC? On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:31 PM Praveen Velliengiri < praveenvelliengiri at gmail.com> wrote:> MCJIT hopefully will be removed in subsequent releases. I think the last > release version is more suitable. > > On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 11:45, Ashok Anand via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Which llvm version is more suitable to switch to orc - vs - mcjit. We >> don't have requirement of lazy compilation, in that case, is it worth >> switching? >> We do have requirement of ability to serialize machine code and reuse it >> later. MCJit seems to provide that option - how well is that supported in >> ORC ? >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190630/e7ce3c01/attachment.html>
Yes I think so.. Could you please tell me in which context (compile time improvement)? That is whether you are interested in knowing whether having ORC instead of MCJIT, will increase your LLVM Build time or you are concerned about the JIT Compilation time? On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 12:48, Ashok Anand <ashok.anand at gmail.com> wrote:> Thanks Praveen. Is it suitable for LLVM 7.0.1 ? Apart from flexibility, > do we see any compile time improvements as well with ORC? > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:31 PM Praveen Velliengiri < > praveenvelliengiri at gmail.com> wrote: > >> MCJIT hopefully will be removed in subsequent releases. I think the last >> release version is more suitable. >> >> On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 11:45, Ashok Anand via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> Which llvm version is more suitable to switch to orc - vs - mcjit. We >>> don't have requirement of lazy compilation, in that case, is it worth >>> switching? >>> We do have requirement of ability to serialize machine code and reuse it >>> later. MCJit seems to provide that option - how well is that supported in >>> ORC ? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >>> >>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190630/4b464951/attachment.html>
yeah i m concerned about jit compilation time.. On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:57 PM Praveen Velliengiri < praveenvelliengiri at gmail.com> wrote:> Yes I think so.. Could you please tell me in which context (compile time > improvement)? That is whether you are interested in knowing whether having > ORC instead of MCJIT, will increase your LLVM Build time or you are > concerned about the JIT Compilation time? > > On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 12:48, Ashok Anand <ashok.anand at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Praveen. Is it suitable for LLVM 7.0.1 ? Apart from flexibility, >> do we see any compile time improvements as well with ORC? >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:31 PM Praveen Velliengiri < >> praveenvelliengiri at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> MCJIT hopefully will be removed in subsequent releases. I think the last >>> release version is more suitable. >>> >>> On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 11:45, Ashok Anand via llvm-dev < >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Which llvm version is more suitable to switch to orc - vs - mcjit. We >>>> don't have requirement of lazy compilation, in that case, is it worth >>>> switching? >>>> We do have requirement of ability to serialize machine code and reuse >>>> it later. MCJit seems to provide that option - how well is that supported >>>> in ORC ? >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >>>> >>>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190630/b55b893c/attachment.html>