llvm dev - Feb 2019 - ADT/SmallSet missing operator ==?

Hello,

Contrary to std::set, SmallSet does not define an operator ==. While it's
not difficult to implement it, I was hoping it would be possible to use it as a
drop-in replacement for std::set (modulo the fact that SmallSet does not
guarantee sorted iteration order).
Is there a special reason for this or is it just a matter that nobody was ever
interested in it?


Thanks
--
Felipe

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190228/e704edfd/attachment.html>

> On Feb 28, 2019, at 10:15 AM, De Azevedo Piovezan, Felipe via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
>  
> Contrary to std::set, SmallSet does not define an operator ==. While it’s
not difficult to implement it, I was hoping it would be possible to use it as a
drop-in replacement for std::set (modulo the fact that SmallSet does not
guarantee sorted iteration order).
> Is there a special reason for this or is it just a matter that nobody was
ever interested in it?
>  
I think that no one ever got around to implementing it.  Patches welcome! :-)

-Chris


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190302/1156fffe/attachment.html>