Dennis Frett via llvm-dev
2019-Jan-18 09:15 UTC
[llvm-dev] Difference when compiling human readable IR vs bitcode with clang frontend
We've noticed a difference in the embedded bitcode when compiling human readable IR to an object directly vs first compiling IR to BC and then an object through clang -cc1. If the original IR file contained an "llvm.compiler.used" gv, it will be preserved when compiling IR -> BC -> Obj. When compiling IR -> Obj directly, it will be removed. This difference does not exist for the "llvm.used" gv however, it is always preserved. This questions seems related to the following lit test in LLVM: https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/test/Transforms/GlobalOpt/compiler-used.ll. Is this somehow expected behaviour? Reproduce: Source taken from the lit test. define void @foo() { ret void } @llvm.used = appending global [1 x i8*] [i8* bitcast (void ()* @foo to i8*)], section "llvm.metadata" @llvm.compiler.used = appending global [1 x i8*] [i8* bitcast (void ()* @foo to i8*)], section "llvm.metadata" # Compile IR -> Obj directly. clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macosx10.13.0 -emit-obj -fembed-bitcode=all -x ir test.ll -o test_ll.o # Compile IR -> BC -> Obj. clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macosx10.13.0 -emit-llvm-bc -fblocks -fencode-extended-block-signature -x ir test.ll -o test.bc clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macosx10.13.0 -emit-obj -fembed-bitcode=all -x ir test.bc -o test_bc.o # Extract and disassemble embedded bitcode from both scenarios. segedit test_bc.o -extract __LLVM __bitcode bc_bc.bc segedit test_ll.o -extract __LLVM __bitcode ll_bc.bc llvm-dis bc_bc.bc llvm-dis ll_bc.bc # Diff both IR files to show that only bc_bc.ll contains "llvm.compiler.used" diff bc_bc.ll ll_bc.ll - Dennis Frett -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 1389 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190118/09565627/attachment.bin>
via llvm-dev
2019-Jan-18 17:09 UTC
[llvm-dev] Difference when compiling human readable IR vs bitcode with clang frontend
> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > Dennis Frett via llvm-dev > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 4:15 AM > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: [llvm-dev] Difference when compiling human readable IR vs bitcode > with clang frontend > > We've noticed a difference in the embedded bitcode when compiling human > readable IR to an object directly vs first compiling IR to BC and then an > object through clang -cc1. > If the original IR file contained an "llvm.compiler.used" gv, it will be > preserved when compiling IR -> BC -> Obj. > When compiling IR -> Obj directly, it will be removed. > > This difference does not exist for the "llvm.used" gv however, it is > always preserved. > This questions seems related to the following lit test in LLVM: > https://github.com/llvm- > mirror/llvm/blob/master/test/Transforms/GlobalOpt/compiler-used.ll. > > Is this somehow expected behaviour?I am curious what happens if you do IR -> BC -> IR -> BC; I'd expect the IR to more-or-less match (the differences all being due to one is hand-written and one is a disassembly) and the two BC files should be identical. If not (and I'm am guessing they aren't, which is why you see some differences in the compiled object file) that's a bug. --paulr> > Reproduce: > Source taken from the lit test. > > define void @foo() { > ret void > } > > @llvm.used = appending global [1 x i8*] [i8* bitcast (void ()* @foo to > i8*)], section "llvm.metadata" > @llvm.compiler.used = appending global [1 x i8*] [i8* bitcast (void ()* > @foo to i8*)], section "llvm.metadata" > > > # Compile IR -> Obj directly. > clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macosx10.13.0 -emit-obj -fembed- > bitcode=all -x ir test.ll -o test_ll.o > > # Compile IR -> BC -> Obj. > clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macosx10.13.0 -emit-llvm-bc -fblocks - > fencode-extended-block-signature -x ir test.ll -o test.bc > clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macosx10.13.0 -emit-obj -fembed- > bitcode=all -x ir test.bc -o test_bc.o > > # Extract and disassemble embedded bitcode from both scenarios. > segedit test_bc.o -extract __LLVM __bitcode bc_bc.bc > segedit test_ll.o -extract __LLVM __bitcode ll_bc.bc > llvm-dis bc_bc.bc > llvm-dis ll_bc.bc > > # Diff both IR files to show that only bc_bc.ll contains > "llvm.compiler.used" > diff bc_bc.ll ll_bc.ll > > - Dennis Frett
Dennis Frett via llvm-dev
2019-Jan-20 15:18 UTC
[llvm-dev] Difference when compiling human readable IR vs bitcode with clang frontend
Going from IR <-> BC does not seem to create a difference. IR -> BC -> IR -> BC, either with clang frontent or by using llvm-as and llvm-dis yields identical bc files. I have only been able to reproduce this issue when emitting to an object file.> On 18 Jan 2019, at 18:09, <paul.robinson at sony.com> <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of >> Dennis Frett via llvm-dev >> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 4:15 AM >> To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> Subject: [llvm-dev] Difference when compiling human readable IR vs bitcode >> with clang frontend >> >> We've noticed a difference in the embedded bitcode when compiling human >> readable IR to an object directly vs first compiling IR to BC and then an >> object through clang -cc1. >> If the original IR file contained an "llvm.compiler.used" gv, it will be >> preserved when compiling IR -> BC -> Obj. >> When compiling IR -> Obj directly, it will be removed. >> >> This difference does not exist for the "llvm.used" gv however, it is >> always preserved. >> This questions seems related to the following lit test in LLVM: >> https://github.com/llvm- >> mirror/llvm/blob/master/test/Transforms/GlobalOpt/compiler-used.ll. >> >> Is this somehow expected behaviour? > > I am curious what happens if you do IR -> BC -> IR -> BC; I'd expect > the IR to more-or-less match (the differences all being due to one > is hand-written and one is a disassembly) and the two BC files should > be identical. > > If not (and I'm am guessing they aren't, which is why you see some > differences in the compiled object file) that's a bug. > --paulr > >> >> Reproduce: >> Source taken from the lit test. >> >> define void @foo() { >> ret void >> } >> >> @llvm.used = appending global [1 x i8*] [i8* bitcast (void ()* @foo to >> i8*)], section "llvm.metadata" >> @llvm.compiler.used = appending global [1 x i8*] [i8* bitcast (void ()* >> @foo to i8*)], section "llvm.metadata" >> >> >> # Compile IR -> Obj directly. >> clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macosx10.13.0 -emit-obj -fembed- >> bitcode=all -x ir test.ll -o test_ll.o >> >> # Compile IR -> BC -> Obj. >> clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macosx10.13.0 -emit-llvm-bc -fblocks - >> fencode-extended-block-signature -x ir test.ll -o test.bc >> clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-macosx10.13.0 -emit-obj -fembed- >> bitcode=all -x ir test.bc -o test_bc.o >> >> # Extract and disassemble embedded bitcode from both scenarios. >> segedit test_bc.o -extract __LLVM __bitcode bc_bc.bc >> segedit test_ll.o -extract __LLVM __bitcode ll_bc.bc >> llvm-dis bc_bc.bc >> llvm-dis ll_bc.bc >> >> # Diff both IR files to show that only bc_bc.ll contains >> "llvm.compiler.used" >> diff bc_bc.ll ll_bc.ll >> >> - Dennis Frett-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190120/537bc139/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 1389 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190120/537bc139/attachment.bin>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Difference when compiling human readable IR vs bitcode with clang frontend
- [RFC] Embedding Bitcode in Object Files
- Adding bitcode to an existing MachO object file
- [cfe-dev] [RFC] Embedding Bitcode in Object Files
- [RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II)