llvm dev - Mar 2016 - Need help with code generation

On 22 March 2016 at 08:26, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That's not the point at all. There are known unknowns and unknown
unknowns;
> creating known problems and then not at least marking them as such affects
> people down the line.

Far less than what LLVM has today.

Cheers,
Rafael

Hi,

And is that a reason to do so deliberately?

Cheers,

James

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 at 12:31 Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at
gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 22 March 2016 at 08:26, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk>
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > That's not the point at all. There are known unknowns and unknown
> unknowns;
> > creating known problems and then not at least marking them as such
> affects
> > people down the line.
>
>
> Far less than what LLVM has today.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160322/cf0a8b85/attachment.html>

On 22 March 2016 at 08:35, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> And is that a reason to do so deliberately?
No, the reason is to put time where user will notice. If you want to
avoid crashes, please look at the places where crashes are common.

Cheers,
Rafael