Hello Tim, Thank you for the information. I am wondering if anyone else is facing the same issue? Or it is just that my institute firewall is creating the problem. Regards, Utpal Bora Ph.D. Scholar +917032002001 Computer Science & Engineering IIT Hyderabad On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi Uptal, > > On 20 March 2016 at 01:06, Utpal Bora via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Please suggest which repo is used by most developers or what alternative > I > > can use? > > It doesn't really matter: no-one can push to either of them and the > github one is a direct clone of llvm.org (which itself just picks > commits up from the canonical svn repository). > > Cheers. > > Tim. >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160321/3e736aae/attachment.html>
On 20 March 2016 at 21:05, Utpal Bora <cs14mtech11017 at iith.ac.in> wrote:> I am wondering if anyone else is facing the same issue? Or it is just that > my institute firewall is creating the problem.As a comparison, I just cloned http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git and it took 142 seconds. I'd be pretty surprised if GitHub was ever slower than our pretty overworked server (it was 90 seconds for me). But I wouldn't call either of those "very slow" for a project the size of LLVM. So if you're seeing something very different, it might well be local to your network (but who knows, really?). Cheers. Tim.
I am still getting around 20KiBps. It might be a local issue. Thank you for confirming this. Regards, Utpal Bora Ph.D. Scholar +917032002001 Computer Science & Engineering IIT Hyderabad On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:> On 20 March 2016 at 21:05, Utpal Bora <cs14mtech11017 at iith.ac.in> wrote: > > I am wondering if anyone else is facing the same issue? Or it is just > that > > my institute firewall is creating the problem. > > As a comparison, I just cloned http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git and it > took 142 seconds. I'd be pretty surprised if GitHub was ever slower > than our pretty overworked server (it was 90 seconds for me). > > But I wouldn't call either of those "very slow" for a project the size > of LLVM. So if you're seeing something very different, it might well > be local to your network (but who knows, really?). > > Cheers. > > Tim. >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160321/42312730/attachment.html>