I had hoped to tag rc3 today (I feel like I've said this a lot lately), but it's at least really, really close. I'm waiting for: - r261297 - Implement the likely resolution of core issue 253. Still in post-commit review. - D17507 - The controlling expression for _Generic is unevaluated New for today. Waiting for review. Thanks, Hans
Ismail Donmez via llvm-dev
2016-Feb-23 07:47 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Openmp-dev] [3.8 Release] Release status
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:48 AM, Hans Wennborg via Openmp-dev <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> I had hoped to tag rc3 today (I feel like I've said this a lot > lately), but it's at least really, really close. I'm waiting for: > > - r261297 - Implement the likely resolution of core issue 253. > Still in post-commit review.I originally wanted this one but the fix involved even more discussion so I guess it would be safer to put it in 3.8.1 instead. Thanks, ismail
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:> I had hoped to tag rc3 today (I feel like I've said this a lot > lately), but it's at least really, really close. I'm waiting for: > > - r261297 - Implement the likely resolution of core issue 253. > Still in post-commit review. > > - D17507 - The controlling expression for _Generic is unevaluated > New for today. Waiting for review.This one should hopefully be relatively straight-forward to review. ~Aaron
Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev
2016-Feb-23 21:51 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Openmp-dev] [3.8 Release] Release status
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Ismail Donmez <ismail at i10z.com> wrote:> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:48 AM, Hans Wennborg via Openmp-dev > <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> I had hoped to tag rc3 today (I feel like I've said this a lot >> lately), but it's at least really, really close. I'm waiting for: >> >> - r261297 - Implement the likely resolution of core issue 253. >> Still in post-commit review. > > I originally wanted this one but the fix involved even more discussion > so I guess it would be safer to put it in 3.8.1 instead.Right. Since this seems complicated, and not strictly fixing a regression, I'm not going to wait for it. Thanks, Hans