On 2016-01-30 07:39, Eric Christopher wrote:> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:38 PM whitequark <whitequark at whitequark.org> > wrote: > >> On 2016-01-30 07:36, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> It's known to be failing right now because of recent changes, but >> I'm >>> curious why that bot has ocaml installed for the bindings? >> >> I would guess because I've been asking for OCaml to be installed >> for quite some time :) > > Heh. Of all the timing :)I'm trying to move cross-continent so I don't have time to implement the (fairly substantial) proper fix to the breakage right now, but I'll do it ASAP, probably around 2nd.> > -eric > >>> >>> -eric >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:34 PM Dmitri Gribenko via llvm-dev >>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Peter, >>>> >>>> Could you take a look at this failure? >>>> >>>> >>> >> > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-debian-fast/builds/35168/steps/test/logs/stdio >>>> >>>> Dmitri >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >> main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if >>>> (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko >> <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> >> -- >> whitequark-- whitequark
Eric Christopher via llvm-dev
2016-Jan-31 05:36 UTC
[llvm-dev] Ocaml binding tests are failing
Sounds good, thanks for the heads up. On Sat, Jan 30, 2016, 9:28 PM whitequark <whitequark at whitequark.org> wrote:> On 2016-01-30 07:39, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:38 PM whitequark <whitequark at whitequark.org> > > wrote: > > > >> On 2016-01-30 07:36, Eric Christopher wrote: > >>> It's known to be failing right now because of recent changes, but > >> I'm > >>> curious why that bot has ocaml installed for the bindings? > >> > >> I would guess because I've been asking for OCaml to be installed > >> for quite some time :) > > > > Heh. Of all the timing :) > > I'm trying to move cross-continent so I don't have time to implement > the (fairly substantial) proper fix to the breakage right now, but I'll > do it ASAP, probably around 2nd. > > > > > -eric > > > >>> > >>> -eric > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:34 PM Dmitri Gribenko via llvm-dev > >>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Peter, > >>>> > >>>> Could you take a look at this failure? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-debian-fast/builds/35168/steps/test/logs/stdio > >>>> > >>>> Dmitri > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >> main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if > >>>> (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko > >> <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/ > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> LLVM Developers mailing list > >>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > >>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > >> > >> -- > >> whitequark > > -- > whitequark >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160131/f6426608/attachment.html>
Dmitri Gribenko via llvm-dev
2016-Feb-05 09:42 UTC
[llvm-dev] Ocaml binding tests are failing
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 9:28 PM, whitequark <whitequark at whitequark.org> wrote:> On 2016-01-30 07:39, Eric Christopher wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:38 PM whitequark <whitequark at whitequark.org> >> wrote: >> >>> On 2016-01-30 07:36, Eric Christopher wrote: >>>> >>>> It's known to be failing right now because of recent changes, but >>> >>> I'm >>>> >>>> curious why that bot has ocaml installed for the bindings? >>> >>> >>> I would guess because I've been asking for OCaml to be installed >>> for quite some time :) >> >> >> Heh. Of all the timing :) > > > I'm trying to move cross-continent so I don't have time to implement > the (fairly substantial) proper fix to the breakage right now, but I'll > do it ASAP, probably around 2nd.Hi, I understand you might not have the time to fix the tests right now. Could you XFAIL them in the meantime though? Dmitri -- main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/
Eric Christopher via llvm-dev
2016-Feb-06 00:55 UTC
[llvm-dev] Ocaml binding tests are failing
I've done this temporarily:
commit db58ab320826671ca152b0c714fbf8d506383e67
Author: Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>
Date: Fri Feb 5 23:28:03 2016 +0000
Make the OCaml tests temporarily unsupported until they can be updated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk at 259954
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-debian-fast/builds/35322
-eric
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:42 AM Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 9:28 PM, whitequark <whitequark at
whitequark.org>
> wrote:
> > On 2016-01-30 07:39, Eric Christopher wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:38 PM whitequark <whitequark at
whitequark.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2016-01-30 07:36, Eric Christopher wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> It's known to be failing right now because of recent
changes, but
> >>>
> >>> I'm
> >>>>
> >>>> curious why that bot has ocaml installed for the bindings?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I would guess because I've been asking for OCaml to be
installed
> >>> for quite some time :)
> >>
> >>
> >> Heh. Of all the timing :)
> >
> >
> > I'm trying to move cross-continent so I don't have time to
implement
> > the (fairly substantial) proper fix to the breakage right now, but
I'll
> > do it ASAP, probably around 2nd.
>
> Hi,
>
> I understand you might not have the time to fix the tests right now.
> Could you XFAIL them in the meantime though?
>
> Dmitri
>
> --
> main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
> (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at
gmail.com>*/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160206/7f16efc4/attachment.html>