llvm dev - Dec 2015 - Substitute instruction with a jump to a library code

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at
korobeynikov.info
> wrote:
> Just a side note - the assembly posted is clearly ARM, not MSP430 :)

Isn't MSP430 an ARM based chip?



-- 
Rail Shafigulin
Software Engineer
Esencia Technologies
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151230/5617a13c/attachment.html>

On 12/30/15 11:21 AM, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Anton Korobeynikov
> <anton at korobeynikov.info <mailto:anton at
korobeynikov.info>> wrote:
>
>     Just a side note - the assembly posted is clearly ARM, not MSP430 :)
>
>
> Isn't MSP430 an ARM based chip?
No. MSP430 is its own architecture.


Jon
>
>
>
> --
> Rail Shafigulin
> Software Engineer
> Esencia Technologies
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-- 
Jon Roelofs
jonathan at codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded

It turns out that there is an option that I didn't know existed (I should
thank my boss), -soft-float. It allows to enable/disable of floating point
instructions, provided your target is using them.

-- 
Rail Shafigulin
Software Engineer
Esencia Technologies
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151230/d7d38b57/attachment.html>

>
>
>>
> No. MSP430 is its own architecture.
>
>
> Jon

Thanks for the correction. I confused MSP430 with TM4C. :D



-- 
Rail Shafigulin
Software Engineer
Esencia Technologies
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151230/2685f751/attachment.html>