llvm dev - Oct 2015 - Code owner for the new AVR backend

I think you can probably treat that as a broad ‘no objection’ by the community. 
Are there any other active contributors to the AVR back end?

David
> On 27 Oct 2015, at 09:41, Dylan McKay via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Ping.
> 
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Dylan McKay <dylanmckay34 at
gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I have submitted and merged patches for most of the public modifications
required for the AVR backend, and I am amount to start the process of adding the
lib/Target/AVR directory piece by piece.
> 
> As this will be a significant portion of code (~7000 lines), it should have
a code owner.
> 
> I have been working on the backend for the last year, maintaining it,
overseeing contributions, and actively working on it. Because of this I believe
I would be the suitable choice for the code owner.
> 
> Chris “generally supports” this, but suggested that I move this to llvm-dev
from llvm-commits.
> 
> Thoughts welcome!
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

Haven't worked on this yet, but I work on the gcc AVR backend (and
binutils), and I'm very interested in this - I intend to work on it in my
spare time.

Regards
Senthil

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I think you can probably treat that as a broad ‘no objection’ by the
> community.  Are there any other active contributors to the AVR back end?
>
> David
>
> > On 27 Oct 2015, at 09:41, Dylan McKay via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Ping.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Dylan McKay <dylanmckay34 at
gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have submitted and merged patches for most of the public
modifications
> required for the AVR backend, and I am amount to start the process of
> adding the lib/Target/AVR directory piece by piece.
> >
> > As this will be a significant portion of code (~7000 lines), it should
> have a code owner.
> >
> > I have been working on the backend for the last year, maintaining it,
> overseeing contributions, and actively working on it. Because of this I
> believe I would be the suitable choice for the code owner.
> >
> > Chris “generally supports” this, but suggested that I move this to
> llvm-dev from llvm-commits.
> >
> > Thoughts welcome!
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151027/0d1a0bfd/attachment.html>

On 27 Oct 2015, at 09:48, Senthil Kumar <senthil.thecoder at gmail.com>
wrote:
> 
> Haven't worked on this yet, but I work on the gcc AVR backend (and
binutils), and I'm very interested in this - I intend to work on it in my
spare time.
And do you have any comments / objections to Dylan becoming the code owner?

David