llvm dev - Sep 2015 - [RFC] LNT Feature: tracking performance changes

I agree.  I plan to implement that next!
> On Sep 21, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> 
>  However, I think that unless we're able to e-mail commit authors who
cause regressions like we do for buildbot failures, as well as others who are
architecture performance experts on the relevant systems, this won't see the
use it needs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150921/6d44b09e/attachment.html>

Usual caveats apply: timely, narrow-blame, low false positive, and ideally
reproducible (cheaply/easily). Or the emails/issues won't be
actionable/actioned.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Chris Matthews via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I agree.  I plan to implement that next!
>
> On Sep 21, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>
>  However, I think that unless we're able to e-mail commit authors who
> cause regressions like we do for buildbot failures, as well as others who
> are architecture performance experts on the relevant systems, this
won't
> see the use it needs.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150921/4ba91eb1/attachment-0001.html>

Yes.  I will send out a proposal to the list about how to do that when the time
comes.
> On Sep 21, 2015, at 10:01 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Usual caveats apply: timely, narrow-blame, low false positive, and ideally
reproducible (cheaply/easily). Or the emails/issues won't be
actionable/actioned.
> 
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Chris Matthews via llvm-dev <llvm-dev
at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> I agree.  I plan to implement that next!
> 
>> On Sep 21, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov
<mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote:
>> 
>>  However, I think that unless we're able to e-mail commit authors
who cause regressions like we do for buildbot failures, as well as others who
are architecture performance experts on the relevant systems, this won't see
the use it needs.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
<http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150922/3732a7bb/attachment.html>