llvm dev - Jul 2015 - [LLVMdev] [3.7 Release] RC1 has been tagged, Testing Phase I begins

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at
linaro.org> wrote:
> On 17 July 2015 at 17:53, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>> I've created the branch and rc1 tag for libunwind, and included it
in
>> the scripts in r242543. Let me know how it works out.
>
> Thanks! It solved the CMake issue, but now it doesn't build. Since I
> had problems building libcxx on ARM directly before, I won't release
> them now. Just Clang+tools and Compiler RT.
Sounds good to me.
>
> Still, removing the libraries from the list of projects (and
> commenting out the hardcoded symlinks), I can build all the way to
> Phase3, but some of the ASAN tests fail (not sure why) and the tar
> ball isn't created.
>
> I'll investigate the ASAN issues, but it would be good to create the
> binary package anyway, so at least I can upload it to the website and
> other people test their stuff while I figure out the problems in the
> tests.
I thought we ran the tests with "make -k", so I'd expect the
tarball
to be created anyway. Hmm...
>
> Finally, for some reason, the install directory is
> ...install/usr/local/... which is odd.
Oops, that's from r242187. I think the install directory is fine, but
it shouldn't become part of the tarball.
> I'll send a patch with some changes to the test-release.sh script.
Thanks! Are you including a fix for not including "/usr/local" in the
tarball? Otherwise I'll do that.

Cheers,
Hans

On 17 July 2015 at 20:36, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>
wrote:
> Thanks! Are you including a fix for not including "/usr/local" in
the
> tarball? Otherwise I'll do that.
I was going to send two patches, but feel free to get that one out of
the way, since you know where to fix it.

cheers,
--renato

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 17 July 2015 at 20:36, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>> Thanks! Are you including a fix for not including
"/usr/local" in the
>> tarball? Otherwise I'll do that.
>
> I was going to send two patches, but feel free to get that one out of
> the way, since you know where to fix it.
Should be fixed by r242706.

Thanks,
Hans