Tom Stellard
2015-Jul-06 19:55 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:38:15AM -0700, Dan Liew wrote:> Hi Tom, > > I'd like to backport some fixes in LLVM trunk to the 3.6 branch. These > changes only effect the generation of CMake files and should not > change the generated binaries. The changes are > > r240981 > r241080 > > which need to be applied in order. > > Is this okay? >No, it is too late to backport fixes. I'm about to tag 3.6.2 -final. -Tom> Thanks, > Dan.
Dan Liew
2015-Jul-06 20:33 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.
On 6 July 2015 at 12:55, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:38:15AM -0700, Dan Liew wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> I'd like to backport some fixes in LLVM trunk to the 3.6 branch. These >> changes only effect the generation of CMake files and should not >> change the generated binaries. The changes are >> >> r240981 >> r241080 >> >> which need to be applied in order. >> >> Is this okay? >> > > No, it is too late to backport fixes. I'm about to tag 3.6.2 -final.Not even if there are outstanding issues? The patch that needs applying (r241080) only effects the generated CMake files and does effect the binaries. Also as mentioned earlier on in the thread there is something wrong with the binary tarballs built on Ubuntu.
Tom Stellard
2015-Jul-06 20:46 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 3.6.2-rc1 has been tagged. Testers needed.
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 01:33:32PM -0700, Dan Liew wrote:> On 6 July 2015 at 12:55, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:38:15AM -0700, Dan Liew wrote: > >> Hi Tom, > >> > >> I'd like to backport some fixes in LLVM trunk to the 3.6 branch. These > >> changes only effect the generation of CMake files and should not > >> change the generated binaries. The changes are > >> > >> r240981 > >> r241080 > >> > >> which need to be applied in order. > >> > >> Is this okay? > >> > > > > No, it is too late to backport fixes. I'm about to tag 3.6.2 -final. > > Not even if there are outstanding issues? >Yes, even if there are outstanding issues. The only patches we would accepted this late in the release cycle would be patches that fix regressions from 3.6.1 to 3.6.2. -Tom> The patch that needs applying (r241080) only effects the generated > CMake files and does effect the binaries. Also as mentioned earlier on > in the thread there is something wrong with the binary tarballs built > on Ubuntu.