llvm dev - Aug 2014 - [LLVMdev] [3.5 Release] Release Candidate 3 Now Available

On 27 August 2014 11:24, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
wrote:
> I've asked him to test out whether this is still needed, but I strongly
> suspect that this is trying to cope with the same fundamental bug. It means
> that the source packages for 3.5 or non '.deb' binary packages will
fail to
> work on any modern debian or ubuntu 32-bit distro without r216531. =[
This looks serious, should we try an RC4?

--renato

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at
linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 27 August 2014 11:24, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
wrote:
> > I've asked him to test out whether this is still needed, but I
strongly
> > suspect that this is trying to cope with the same fundamental bug. It
> means
> > that the source packages for 3.5 or non '.deb' binary packages
will fail
> to
> > work on any modern debian or ubuntu 32-bit distro without r216531. =[
>
> This looks serious, should we try an RC4?

Personally, I think so. But the decision is Bill's.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140827/110b5529/attachment.html>

Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 27, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at
linaro.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 27 August 2014 11:24, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at
google.com> wrote:
>> I've asked him to test out whether this is still needed, but I
strongly
>> suspect that this is trying to cope with the same fundamental bug. It
means
>> that the source packages for 3.5 or non '.deb' binary packages
will fail to
>> work on any modern debian or ubuntu 32-bit distro without r216531. =[
> 
> This looks serious, should we try an RC4?
This does feel serious enough for an RC4.

I know it's serious when Doug finds the time to write an email. Sorry I
couldn't resist :P


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Aug 27, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at
linaro.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 27 August 2014 11:24, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at
google.com> wrote:
> >> I've asked him to test out whether this is still needed, but I
strongly
> >> suspect that this is trying to cope with the same fundamental bug.
It
> means
> >> that the source packages for 3.5 or non '.deb' binary
packages will
> fail to
> >> work on any modern debian or ubuntu 32-bit distro without r216531.
=[
> >
> > This looks serious, should we try an RC4?
>
> This does feel serious enough for an RC4.
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140828/f4f6b90e/attachment.html>