llvm dev - Jul 2014 - [LLVMdev] Removing lib/MC/MCObjectDisassembler (and more?)

Seems to be largely untested... anyone using this? (cc'ing Kevin as
he's the most likely candidate). At the least for MCAnalysis this
appears to be unused, any ideas on what else can be deleted?

I'll remove just this file unless there are objections tomorrow (or
earlier if I get an ack from Kevin about it).

-eric

Eric, what file are your referring to?  The path lib/MC/MCObjectDisassembler
does not end in a .cpp or .h and is not a directory .

Just a bit more info and I can get back to you if I’m using what your asking
about.

Kev

On Jul 31, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Seems to be largely untested... anyone using this? (cc'ing Kevin as
> he's the most likely candidate). At the least for MCAnalysis this
> appears to be unused, any ideas on what else can be deleted?
> 
> I'll remove just this file unless there are objections tomorrow (or
> earlier if I get an ack from Kevin about it).
> 
> -eric

Oops sorry. lib/MC/MCAnalysis/MCObjectDisassembler.CPP

Thanks.

-eric
On Jul 31, 2014 1:21 PM, "Kevin Enderby" <enderby at apple.com>
wrote:
> Eric, what file are your referring to?  The path
> lib/MC/MCObjectDisassembler does not end in a .cpp or .h and is not a
> directory .
>
> Just a bit more info and I can get back to you if I’m using what your
> asking about.
>
> Kev
>
> On Jul 31, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > Seems to be largely untested... anyone using this? (cc'ing Kevin
as
> > he's the most likely candidate). At the least for MCAnalysis this
> > appears to be unused, any ideas on what else can be deleted?
> >
> > I'll remove just this file unless there are objections tomorrow
(or
> > earlier if I get an ack from Kevin about it).
> >
> > -eric
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140731/dadff0b4/attachment.html>

On 08/ 1/14 03:13 AM, Eric Christopher wrote:
> Seems to be largely untested... anyone using this? (cc'ing Kevin as
> he's the most likely candidate). At the least for MCAnalysis this
> appears to be unused, any ideas on what else can be deleted?
>
> I'll remove just this file unless there are objections tomorrow (or
> earlier if I get an ack from Kevin about it).
I may not be reading this email correctly - isn't the ability to 
disassemble objects an advertised feature? I guess if you're removing 
that capability - make sure to update the website as well..

Is FreeBSD using this as part of their GNU toolchain replacement?

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:28 PM, "C. Bergström"
<cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote:
> On 08/ 1/14 03:13 AM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>>
>> Seems to be largely untested... anyone using this? (cc'ing Kevin as
>> he's the most likely candidate). At the least for MCAnalysis this
>> appears to be unused, any ideas on what else can be deleted?
>>
>> I'll remove just this file unless there are objections tomorrow (or
>> earlier if I get an ack from Kevin about it).
>
> I may not be reading this email correctly - isn't the ability to
disassemble
> objects an advertised feature? I guess if you're removing that
capability -
> make sure to update the website as well..
>
You aren't reading this email correctly. There are other interfaces to
disassemble.

-eric
> Is FreeBSD using this as part of their GNU toolchain replacement?

We're (lightly) using it, but are happy to switch to something else.  Is
there a recommended replacement?


On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Seems to be largely untested... anyone using this? (cc'ing Kevin as
> he's the most likely candidate). At the least for MCAnalysis this
> appears to be unused, any ideas on what else can be deleted?
>
> I'll remove just this file unless there are objections tomorrow (or
> earlier if I get an ack from Kevin about it).
>
> -eric
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140731/51a4e2f8/attachment.html>

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Kevin Modzelewski <kmod at dropbox.com>
wrote:
> We're (lightly) using it, but are happy to switch to something else. 
Is
> there a recommended replacement?
>
Not really, happy if you're using it to keep it. It'd be nice if it
the various aspects were tested :)

-eric
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at
gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Seems to be largely untested... anyone using this? (cc'ing Kevin as
>> he's the most likely candidate). At the least for MCAnalysis this
>> appears to be unused, any ideas on what else can be deleted?
>>
>> I'll remove just this file unless there are objections tomorrow (or
>> earlier if I get an ack from Kevin about it).
>>
>> -eric
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>