Yeah.
I agree that "Chain operand is needed if the intrinsic is reading / writing
memory.”,
Just don’t know where and how to set it up.
like intrinsic “int_x86_xtest:
“
def int_x86_xtest : GCCBuiltin<"__builtin_ia32_xtest">,
Intrinsic<[llvm_i32_ty], [], []>;
“
"def X86xtest: SDNode<"X86ISD::XTEST", SDTypeProfile<1, 0,
[SDTCisVT<0, i32>]>,
[SDNPHasChain, SDNPSideEffect]>;
“
let Defs = [EFLAGS] in
def XTEST : I<0x01, MRM_D6, (outs), (ins),
"xtest", [(set EFLAGS, (X86xtest))]>, TB,
Requires<[HasTSX]>;
which CALL makes the “Intrinsic::x86_xtest” is caught under
“INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN”? feel I missed something, but did not figure out.
tks
kevin
On Jul 23, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at
korobeynikov.info> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Chain operand is needed if the intrinsic is reading / writing memory.
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:02 PM, kewuzhang <kewu.zhang at amd.com>
wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> In X86ISelLowering.cpp
>>
>> I saw”
>> ...
>> case Intrinsic::x86_rdrand_16:
>> case Intrinsic::x86_rdrand_32:
>> ….
>> case Intrinsic::x86_avx512_gather_qpd_512:
>> case Intrinsic::x86_avx512_gather_qps_512:
>> ..
>> “
>> those intrinsics are handled by “LowerINTRINSIC_W_CHAIN”.
>>
>> How the “INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN” opCode is set instead of
“INTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN”?
>>
>> tks
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140723/9961ea60/attachment.html>