Tim Blechmann
2014-Jul-13 10:32 UTC
[LLVMdev] pinging 18097: atomic<> of trivially copyable class is rejected
hi all, bug 18097 has already been discussed on this list more than a year ago, and it is open with a patch attached since last autumn ... despite being tagged as release blocker. is there any estimation when this issue will be fixed? tia, tim
David Blaikie
2014-Jul-16 01:49 UTC
[LLVMdev] pinging 18097: atomic<> of trivially copyable class is rejected
Weird that it wasn't resolved if it was tagged as a release blocker. Apart from that, patches on bugs tend not to get attention. If this matters to you (especially if you're the patch's original author) the patch should be sent to the appropriate -commits list and pinged weekly. On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Tim Blechmann <tim at klingt.org> wrote:> hi all, > > bug 18097 has already been discussed on this list more than a year ago, > and it is open with a patch attached since last autumn ... despite being > tagged as release blocker. is there any estimation when this issue will > be fixed? > > tia, > tim > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Tim Blechmann
2014-Jul-16 07:13 UTC
[LLVMdev] pinging 18097: atomic<> of trivially copyable class is rejected
> Weird that it wasn't resolved if it was tagged as a release blocker. > > Apart from that, patches on bugs tend not to get attention. If this > matters to you (especially if you're the patch's original author) the > patch should be sent to the appropriate -commits list and pinged > weekly.the patch is not mine, but has been provided by howard hinnant. however bill wendling asked richard and doug if it should be fixed in clang or in libc++. that was the end of the discussion.> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Tim Blechmann <tim at klingt.org> wrote: >> hi all, >> >> bug 18097 has already been discussed on this list more than a year ago, >> and it is open with a patch attached since last autumn ... despite being >> tagged as release blocker. is there any estimation when this issue will >> be fixed? >> >> tia, >> tim >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 275 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140716/0532e030/attachment.sig>