On 12 May 2014 10:29, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote:> I suspect 3.4.1 is based off > https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/tree/release_34 > > (llvm probably has something similar I suppose?)This is correct. Though, I don't know if anyone tagged 3.4.1 on that branch, but I suspect what was released is the HEAD of that branch. Tom would know better. If we're doing a 3.4.2 (as was mentioned earlier), we might have to tag all branches. cheers, --renato
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:36:10AM +0100, Renato Golin wrote:> On 12 May 2014 10:29, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > > I suspect 3.4.1 is based off > > https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/tree/release_34 > > > > (llvm probably has something similar I suppose?) > > This is correct. Though, I don't know if anyone tagged 3.4.1 on that > branch, but I suspect what was released is the HEAD of that branch. > > Tom would know better. If we're doing a 3.4.2 (as was mentioned > earlier), we might have to tag all branches. >Are you talking about adding git tags? What is the process for doing this? -Tom> cheers, > --renato
On 12 May 2014 14:33, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> Are you talking about adding git tags? What is the process for doing this?SVN tags, but yeah. You can take note of the commit that we produced the last candidate, but it'd be good to tag all repos with a release number. I'm not sure how people do it, but I'd assume the tags should follow the same as it's done for the main releases. If there isn't any, we should definitely create one. Bill Wendling should be able to confirm the status. cheers, --renato