No regressions this time. Fedora and OpenSUSE binaries uploaded. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> Dropping llvmdev and cc'ing testers directly, so this email > won't be held in moderation for having too many recipients. > > I like having tester discussions on list, so it would probably > be best to reply to the original email without the large cc > list to avoid moderation delays. > > Thanks, > Tom > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:32:06PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There was one regression found in Phase 1 testing, so we need to do > > another round. The regressions was in Clang, so all targets need to > > be retested. > > > > Just a reminder when doing regression testing we know want to compare > > the test results of 3.4.1-rc2 with 3.4-final to see if there are any new > > regressions. Also, please remind me of the platform you are testing on > when you > > send me your results. > > > > Thanks again to all the testers who are helping with this release. > > Hopefully, this will be the last RC. > > > > Thanks, > > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140427/6b07cf20/attachment.html>
No regressions on ARM either. Binaries uploaded. cheers, --renato On 27 April 2014 01:19, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> wrote:> No regressions this time. Fedora and OpenSUSE binaries uploaded. > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: >> >> Dropping llvmdev and cc'ing testers directly, so this email >> won't be held in moderation for having too many recipients. >> >> I like having tester discussions on list, so it would probably >> be best to reply to the original email without the large cc >> list to avoid moderation delays. >> >> Thanks, >> Tom >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:32:06PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > There was one regression found in Phase 1 testing, so we need to do >> > another round. The regressions was in Clang, so all targets need to >> > be retested. >> > >> > Just a reminder when doing regression testing we know want to compare >> > the test results of 3.4.1-rc2 with 3.4-final to see if there are any new >> > regressions. Also, please remind me of the platform you are testing on >> > when you >> > send me your results. >> > >> > Thanks again to all the testers who are helping with this release. >> > Hopefully, this will be the last RC. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Tom >> > _______________________________________________ >> > LLVM Developers mailing list >> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >
Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison
2014-Apr-28 12:00 UTC
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.4.1 Testing Phase Part 2
Hi all, No regression for x86_64 / Ubuntu-12.04 Binaries uploaded. Cheers, -- Arnaud On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote:> No regressions on ARM either. Binaries uploaded. > > cheers, > --renato > > On 27 April 2014 01:19, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> wrote: > > No regressions this time. Fedora and OpenSUSE binaries uploaded. > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > >> > >> Dropping llvmdev and cc'ing testers directly, so this email > >> won't be held in moderation for having too many recipients. > >> > >> I like having tester discussions on list, so it would probably > >> be best to reply to the original email without the large cc > >> list to avoid moderation delays. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Tom > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:32:06PM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > There was one regression found in Phase 1 testing, so we need to do > >> > another round. The regressions was in Clang, so all targets need to > >> > be retested. > >> > > >> > Just a reminder when doing regression testing we know want to compare > >> > the test results of 3.4.1-rc2 with 3.4-final to see if there are any > new > >> > regressions. Also, please remind me of the platform you are testing > on > >> > when you > >> > send me your results. > >> > > >> > Thanks again to all the testers who are helping with this release. > >> > Hopefully, this will be the last RC. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Tom > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > LLVM Developers mailing list > >> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > >> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140428/beaad7c8/attachment.html>